ISSUE-163: Simon Grant: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
@type overloading
Simon Grant: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2013-10-22
- Description:
- This issue was originally raised by Adrian Pohl and Simon Grant:
To me (and possibly others) it would be helpful either
(a) to put a note in section 5.4 in any case -- not talking about type coercion, but simply noting that @type arrays cannot be used within @context (you don't have to say why at that point), or
(b) to dis-overload (?) @type, so that within @context there is "@valuetype" or something, with @type reserved for nodes outside the context.
Thread starts here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Aug/0033.html
Comment above is from this email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Oct/0016.html - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from pohl@hbz-nrw.de on 2013-11-04)
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from asimong@gmail.com on 2013-11-02)
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from asimong@gmail.com on 2013-10-31)
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2013-10-31)
- Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from asimong@gmail.com on 2013-10-22)
- Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2013-10-22)
- RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-22)
Related notes:
Commenter accepted changes but also suggested some further improvements:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0074.html
The documents were further improved but we didn't get a response regarding the last changes yet.
Display change log