ISSUE-147: LC comment: Definition of "Generalized RDF"
LC comment: Definition of "Generalized RDF"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Concepts
- Raised by:
- Guus Schreiber
- Opened on:
- 2013-10-02
- Description:
- Comment by David Booth:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0006.html
Regarding section 7
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-generalized-rdf
It does not look like my comments about Generalized RDF were addressed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Aug/0008.html
[[
I think the most appropriate place for the definition of "generalized
RDF" would be in the RDF Semantics document, for two reasons: (a) that's
where the notion is actually used (to simplify entailment rules); and
(b) that would give it less prominence and hence reduce the likelihood
that someone would think it is a form of standard RDF.
]]
Also, I still think it needs a stronger warning that generalized RDF is
non-standard.
Also, in Section 7 "A generalized RDF graph is an RDF graph" should be
"A generalized RDF graph is a graph", because the whole point is that a
*generalized* RDF graph is *not* necessarily a conforming RDF graph.
David - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-24)
- [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" - ISSUE-147 (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-23)
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-22)
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-21)
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-21)
- Fwd: Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-21)
- Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-21)
- Fwd: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from david@3roundstones.com on 2013-10-16)
- Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-16)
- Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-16)
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-10-16)
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-10-16)
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from david@3roundstones.com on 2013-10-16)
- ISSUE-157: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to issue-147 (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
- Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (ISSUE-147) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-02)
- RDF-ISSUE-147: Definition of "Generalized RDF" [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-02)
Related notes:
Change accepted: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0050.html
Markus Lanthaler, 22 Oct 2013, 13:43:54Closed at 23 Oct telecon:
https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-10-23#resolution_4
Display change log