ISSUE-147: LC comment: Definition of "Generalized RDF"

LC comment: Definition of "Generalized RDF"

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDF Concepts

Raised by:

Guus Schreiber

Opened on:

2013-10-02

Description:

Comment by David Booth:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0006.html

Regarding section 7
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-generalized-rdf

It does not look like my comments about Generalized RDF were addressed:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Aug/0008.html
[[
I think the most appropriate place for the definition of "generalized
RDF" would be in the RDF Semantics document, for two reasons: (a) that's
where the notion is actually used (to simplify entailment rules); and
(b) that would give it less prominence and hence reduce the likelihood
that someone would think it is a form of standard RDF.
]]

Also, I still think it needs a stronger warning that generalized RDF is
non-standard.

Also, in Section 7 "A generalized RDF graph is an RDF graph" should be
"A generalized RDF graph is a graph", because the whole point is that a
*generalized* RDF graph is *not* necessarily a conforming RDF graph.

David

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-24)
2. [RESOLVED] Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" - ISSUE-147 (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-23)
3. Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-22)
4. Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-21)
5. Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-21)
6. Fwd: Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-21)
7. Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from david@dbooth.org on 2013-10-21)
8. Fwd: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from david@3roundstones.com on 2013-10-16)
9. Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-16)
10. Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-16)
11. Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-10-16)
12. Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-10-16)
13. Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (from david@3roundstones.com on 2013-10-16)
14. ISSUE-157: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to issue-147 (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
15. Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (ISSUE-147) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-02)
16. RDF-ISSUE-147: Definition of "Generalized RDF" [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-02)

Related notes:

Display change log