ISSUE-116: LC Comment: revised reponse to 'Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF" '
LC Comment: revised reponse to 'Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF" '
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Turtle
- Raised by:
- Guus Schreiber
- Opened on:
- 2013-02-13
- Description:
- Original response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2012Sep/0075.html
However, in contrast to the response (accepted by the commenter) we did move this to a separate note, but kept it in a non-normative section the the main document - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTIO-229: finding the evidence (from eric@w3.org on 2013-02-14)
- Re: ACTIO-229: finding the evidence (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-02-14)
- ACTIO-229: finding the evidence (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-02-14)
- Re: ACTIO-229: finding the evidence (from gavin@carothers.name on 2013-02-13)
- RDF-ISSUE-116: LC Comment: revised reponse to 'Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF" ' [RDF Turtle] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-13)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: in accordance with our recollection of earlier decisions, the WG had elected to keep the section on "Turtle in XHMTL " as a non-normative appendix in the Turtle spec
See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2013-02-13#resolution_2
The reversal of the original decision is in the minutes of the 10 Oct 2012 telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-10#resolution_17
Display change log
