PIL OWL Ontology Meeting 2012-05-14

From Provenance WG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Meeting Information

prov-wg - Modeling Task Force - OWL group telecon


  • Tim
  • Daniel
  • Stian
  • Satya 
  • Jun
  • Paul (regrets)
  • Stephan (regrets)
  • Khalid (regrets)


For the issues that you are assigned:

  • describe the original concern
  • describe any perspectives already expressed
  • recommend next step, or propose a solution

open discussion on "collections document"






  • For ProvRDF issues, move RAISED issues to either POSTPONED, OPEN, or CLOSED
  • http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/9
    • Tim: be ruthless on POSTPONE
    • Satya: most are closed, but issue 283 (Note and Location are not subclass of Entity - by Stian)
    • ... noting down in an email, noting the status
    • ... will send email outlinging 
  • For Involvement example - use non PROV properties (not use specific sub-type of involvement)
    • Satya will revisit it. 
    • (wasConductedBy the take away is that one can recognize PROV qualification for non-PROV involvements.)



  • http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/363 prov:value collision
    • option: different namespace for collections.
    • option: rename object proprty prov:value to prov:keyPairValue or similar
    • option: rename datatype property prov:value to prov:content?


seed issues

How would you encode http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#acknowledgements in prov-o?

New issues



  • dm is clear, 
  • can't guess the directionality
  • wasQuoteOf ?
  • wasQuotedOf ?

Discussion on prov:value Dani: If you like wasQuotedOf better than wasQuotedFrom, then maybe you should raise onto the mailing list again? Jun: Dani, you need to poke that threat again, to make it alive. I almost totally forgot about this concern of yours. I will do it right now. :) Daniel, We started with wasQuoteOf http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-prov-dm-20111018/#quotation But moved away because not clear.