ISSUE-348: maintain property naming conventions
prov-o-propery-name-conventions
maintain property naming conventions
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-14
- Description:
- prov:had* have domain of prov:Involvement (or some subproperty)
prov:{activity,entity,agent,collection} are used as rdf:object and have their corresponding range. Their domain is some prov:Involvement.
prov:qualifiedXXX has range XXX and parallels (as closely as possible) the unqualified prov:involved subproperty:
prov:wasDerivedFrom
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-04-29)
- PROV-ISSUE-348 (prov-o-propery-name-conventions): maintain property naming conventions [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-14)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-13)
Related notes:
https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/338 on PROV-O HTML is about documenting and motivating these conventions.
Timothy Lebo, 22 Apr 2012, 18:43:07property names have sufficient naming uniformity. Collections are the only outliers, but they are being reviewed separately.
Timothy Lebo, 30 May 2012, 20:59:22Display change log
