Agenda PROV-WG telecon 09 June 2011

Teleconferences (official participants and invited guests only):
- Thursdays, 8 am San Francisco, 11 am Boston, 4 pm London, 5 pm Paris
- For up to 90 minutes, goal is 60 minutes.
- Dial +1-617-761-6200 or sip:zakim@voip.w3.org then conference code 7768#
- IRC channel: #prov (http://irc.w3.org/?channels=prov).
- Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
- RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
- Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Scribes

Admin

• Chair: Paul Groth
• Scribe: ??

• PROPOSED to accept the minutes of 02 Jun telecon

   http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-06-02

• Record that Helena Zeus and Stephan Zednik have agreed to coordinate the activities of the Implementation and Test Cases Task Force till F2F1

• Record the vote result on:
  • In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of an invariant view or perspective on a thing
  • http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Jun/0096.html

• Action items to review:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/open

• Invited experts update
  • Invite newcomers to introduce themselves on the mailing list

• Scribes

PAQ TF Plan to F2F1

• Review PAQ TF plan till F2F1
• http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Jun/0068.html
• Identify contributors and timetable

Connection TF Plan to F2F1

• Review of Connection TF plan till F2F1 [1]
• Identify contributors and timetable

Implementation and Test Cases TF Plan to F2F1

• Review of Implementation and Test Cases TF plan till F2F1
• Identify contributors and timetable

Model Task Force

• Reaching consensus on concept properties identified in proposed definitions on the Wiki (cont'd)
  • Process

proposed

1. there is a distinction between process execution and process specification/definition
2. process specification/definition is referred to as recipe in the charter and is out of sope for this WG
3. terminology (for process specification/definition, process execution, recipe) needs to be agreed on, if appropriate

• • Process Execution

proposed

A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval

• • Process Execution

proposed

A process execution has either completed (occurred in the past) or is occurring in present (partially complete). In other words, the start of a process execution is always in the past.

• • More to follow ...

AOB