ISSUE-70: PAQ document uses inconsistent terminology for "provenance"
provenance-term
PAQ document uses inconsistent terminology for "provenance"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Accessing and Querying Provenance
- Raised by:
- Graham Klyne
- Opened on:
- 2011-08-04
- Description:
- (11) The whole document is inconsistent in how it calls what we want to
access. Sometimes it uses "provenance information", sometimes "provenance
data", and sometimes just "provenance". For instance, section 2 contains all
three. The document should be consistent and, thus, use only a single term.
I don't know whether the Model TF agrees on something that we may adopt
here. If not, I suggest "provenance description".
Cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0032.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: prov-aq issues resolved (from hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de on 2012-04-20)
- prov-aq issues resolved (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-04-05)
- Re: [PAQ] editorial issues (from hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de on 2011-08-18)
- Re: [PAQ] editorial issues (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-08-04)
- PROV-ISSUE-70 (provenance-term): PAQ document uses inconsistent terminology for 'provenance' (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-04)
Related notes:
I closed this issue. The latest revision of prov-aq now consistently uses the term provenance information through out.
Olaf.
Display change log
