ISSUE-641: Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation?
TomDN
Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-DICTIONARY
- Raised by:
- Tom De Nies
- Opened on:
- 2013-03-07
- Description:
- Came up in Luc's review, but it was decided to handle this in the next release.
Should qualifiedInsertion and qualifiedRemoval imply qualifiedDerivation? If yes, how do we specify this? Through a sub-property? Does that break anything?
Note that Insertion and Removal are already subclasses of Derivation. Do we need this extra implication then? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-22)
- PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log