ISSUE-641: Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation?

TomDN

Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

PROV-DICTIONARY

Raised by:

Tom De Nies

Opened on:

2013-03-07

Description:

Came up in Luc's review, but it was decided to handle this in the next release.

Should qualifiedInsertion and qualifiedRemoval imply qualifiedDerivation? If yes, how do we specify this? Through a sub-property? Does that break anything?

Note that Insertion and Removal are already subclasses of Derivation. Do we need this extra implication then?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-22)
4. PROV-ISSUE-641 (TomDN): Should qualifiedInsertion/Removal imply qualifiedDerivation? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-07)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log