ISSUE-639: Notation of hadDictionaryMember
TomDN
Notation of hadDictionaryMember
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-DICTIONARY
- Raised by:
- Tom De Nies
- Opened on:
- 2013-03-07
- Description:
- Originally raised by Luc in his review, but agreed to discuss this for the next draft.
In the notation hadDictionaryMember(d, e0, "k0"), key follows entity, whereas it precedes in derivedByInsertionFrom(d2, d1, {("k1", e3)}). Should this be made uniform? Is it worth the extra effort? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2013-03-07)
- PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log