ISSUE-639: Notation of hadDictionaryMember

TomDN

Notation of hadDictionaryMember

State:
CLOSED
Product:
PROV-DICTIONARY
Raised by:
Tom De Nies
Opened on:
2013-03-07
Description:
Originally raised by Luc in his review, but agreed to discuss this for the next draft.

In the notation hadDictionaryMember(d, e0, "k0"), key follows entity, whereas it precedes in derivedByInsertionFrom(d2, d1, {("k1", e3)}). Should this be made uniform? Is it worth the extra effort?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
  2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
  3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-22)
  4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2013-03-07)
  5. PROV-ISSUE-639 (TomDN): Notation of hadDictionaryMember [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-07)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 639.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:58 vivien Exp $