ISSUE-634: Small issues to fix in the DC Note
small issues-paul
Small issues to fix in the DC Note
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core
- Raised by:
- Daniel Garijo
- Opened on:
- 2013-02-27
- Description:
- A couple of things to think about for next round:
- It seems we should say something about the dct:provenance relation other thatn we don't do a mapping. Can we not map it to bundles or have it point to an entity? I wonder what the relation to prov:has_provenance is?
- In section 2.2. point 1) - I would remove the mention of blank nodes - this doesn't seem to add anything
- Does "his leads to bloated and not very intuitive data representations." add anything?
- In section 2.2 you mention a clean-up phase which has not yet been described.
- There's a typo in the acknowledgments "Iniciative" should be "initiative"
Clarify: can the complex mappings be used to create dublin core statements from prov? Are they bidirectional? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- PROV-ISSUE-634 (small issues-paul): Small issues to fix in the DC Note [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
