ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ?

pingback-in-prov-aq

Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ?

State:
PENDING REVIEW
Product:
Accessing and Querying Provenance
Raised by:
Graham Klyne
Opened on:
2013-01-31
Description:
Some reviewers have commented that the provenance ping back description may be out-of-place in the PROV-AQ document.

This issue is a place-holder to bring this to a group vote, when the current PROV-AQ editing round is done. (One reason for this delay os that Stian has proposed a small change to how pingback may work that could make it function more like an alternative discovery mechanism.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RE: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-03-13)
  2. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-03-13)
  3. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2013-03-13)
  4. prov-wg: core paq issues - please think/discuss before telcon (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2013-03-13)
  5. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-03-12)
  6. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2013-03-12)
  7. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2013-03-12)
  8. Re: [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-11)
  9. [PROV-AQ] ISSUE-618: Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? (from Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2013-03-11)
  10. PROV-AQ responses to Luc's review (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2013-03-11)
  11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2013-02-04)
  12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from pgroth@gmail.com on 2013-02-03)
  13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-02-01)
  14. Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2013-02-01)
  15. Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-01-31)
  16. PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-31)

Related notes:

I note that the pingback mechanism has been simplified to be a simple discovery mechanism in the current editors draft.

Graham Klyne, 7 Mar 2013, 15:10:12

See also issue 600

Graham Klyne, 11 Mar 2013, 10:17:52

Per teleconference 20130314 (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2013-03-14) this will be retained unless major problems are exposed by reviewers.

Graham Klyne, 25 Mar 2013, 16:00:29

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 618.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:56 vivien Exp $