ISSUE-61: is revision necessary?


is revision necessary?

Raised by:
Graham Klyne
Opened on:
5.14 Revision

This seems to be just a different form of Derivation that happens to
mention an agent. I'm not sure why I'd choose one over the other.

I think this may be unnecessary - would not a similar effect be
achieved by having a process execution of "revision" that uses b1,
generates b2 and is controlled by ag (possibly with role "revise"?).
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] (from on 2011-08-22)
  2. PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] (from on 2011-07-29)

Related notes:

isRevisionOf is a strict subrelation of isDerivedFrom.

Luc Moreau, 5 Aug 2011, 15:13:06

GK said close

Luc Moreau, 25 Aug 2011, 23:53:45

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <>.
$Id: 61.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:56 vivien Exp $