ISSUE-61: is revision necessary?
is-revision-necessary
is revision necessary?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Graham Klyne
- Opened on:
- 2011-07-29
- Description:
- 5.14 Revision
This seems to be just a different form of Derivation that happens to
mention an agent. I'm not sure why I'd choose one over the other.
I think this may be unnecessary - would not a similar effect be
achieved by having a process execution of "revision" that uses b1,
generates b2 and is controlled by ag (possibly with role "revise"?).
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-08-22)
- PROV-ISSUE-61 (is-revision-necessary): is revision necessary? [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-29)
Related notes:
isRevisionOf is a strict subrelation of isDerivedFrom.
GK said close
Luc Moreau, 25 Aug 2011, 23:53:45Display change log