ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ?
Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Accessing and Querying Provenance
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-06-02
- Description:
- Does PAQ define any terms that need to be defined in PROV-O?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-05)
- PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-02)
Related notes:
Paul: would like these to be in the ontology file
not the document.
Moving to paq product. The terms are defined in prov.owl, PAQ needs to keep them updated (by coordinating with prov-o team).
Timothy Lebo, 5 Jun 2012, 17:30:22I think we're agreed on the direction for this. The PROV-AQ document directory contains OWL/TTL files with term definitions. SO we just need to make sure they're aligned with the document.
Graham Klyne, 6 Nov 2012, 15:57:27Display change log
