ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity?

Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Khalid Belhajjame
Opened on:
2011-07-21
Description:
Do we need a mean to specify that two BOB are characterizations of the same entity?

In the initial draft, I think that the editors intentionally avoided defining the term "entity" as part of the vocabulary. I don't suggest defining that term, but having a means by which one would know that two Bobs are characterizations, possibly different, of the same entity, e.g., using an assertion like "sameEntity(bob1, bob2)".

I think this will be useful, amongst other things, in the definition of IVPof.

Khalid
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-04-20)
  2. [PROV-O] issues in document (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-10-13)
  3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-08-22)
  4. RE: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-07-25)
  5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-07-25)
  6. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-07-25)
  7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-07-21)
  8. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2011-07-21)
  9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2011-07-21)
  10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-07-21)
  11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2011-07-21)
  12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-07-21)
  13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-07-21)
  14. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-07-21)
  15. Re: PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-07-21)
  16. PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-21)

Related notes:


There didn't seem to be support for this, unless I am mistaken.
No change introduced.

Luc Moreau, 5 Aug 2011, 15:20:40

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 35.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:38 vivien Exp $