ISSUE-263: Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment

implicit-subject-problem

Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Ontology

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2012-02-23

Description:

The mapping allows for a given qualified involvement (here usage u1) to be linked with different activities (here a1 and a2).

Used(u1, a1, e, attrs)
Used(u1, a2, e, attrs)


This applies for all forms of involvements.

The origin of the problem is that the object is explicit in an involvement but the subject is implicit (with property qualified).

solution? See my other issue (ISSUE-262) related to qualified.
It's likely that a solution can address both issues at once.
Either introduce functional property from involvement to subject, or restore hadUsage which should be inverse functional.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-08)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-07)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-02)
4. Re: ACTION-70 (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-26)
5. Re: ACTION-70 (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-16)
6. ACTION-70 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-16)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-306 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (5/6) Luc [Ontology] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-15)
8. Re: PROV-ISSUE-306 (TLebo): PROV-O OWL review (5/6) Luc [Ontology] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-03-15)
9. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-06)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-02-27)
11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-27)
12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-27)
13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-27)
14. Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-24)
15. RE: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2012-02-24)
16. PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-24)
17. reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-23)
18. PROV-ISSUE-263 (implicit-subject-problem): Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-23)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log