ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range
hadTemporalExtent domain and range
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Stephan Zednik
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-22
- Description:
- hadTemporalExtent has rdfs:domain prov:Involvement, which means if anything has a prov:hadTemporalExtent that it will be inferred to be a member of the class prov:Involvement.
Since a temporal extent describes the time (interval or instant) over which something occurred, I would prefer to not restrict the class of things with temporal extent to Involvement. For example, I think it would make sense in practice for Activities to use hadTemporalExtent.
Also, I would like the range of hadTemporalExtent to be relaxed to include both TimeInstant and intervals of time (which we currently do not model in prov-o). In OWL-Time this would be time:TemporalEntity (union of time:Instant and time:Interval).
--Stephan
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-02-27)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-02-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-22)
- PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-22)
Related notes:
made changes to ontology
Timothy Lebo, 24 Feb 2012, 05:53:52The in-question hadTemporalExtent has been removed.
The current time predicates (atTime, startedAtTime, endedAtTime) are all DatatypeProperties with reasonable domains and the logical range xsd:dateTime.
I am closing this issue.
Display change log
