ISSUE-160: Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme
TLebo
Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2011-11-21
- Description:
- [1] introduces a new classification scheme for wasDerivedFrom using two characteristics:
1) the number of activities that lead to a derivation
2) a level of "precision" i.e., the amount of description provided.
A) I propose to reduce the amount of redundant terms used to define derivation, so that the definitions may be clearer.
choose one: imprecise XOR lax
choose one: precise XOR exact
choose one: number of activities XOR degree
B) The previous versions' use of "Qualified" was a natural way to distinguish the simple descriptions from their more elaborate forms. Why did that seem to go away?
Regards,
Tim
[1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/308f9e30cc7e/model/ProvenanceModel.html#Derivation-Relation - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-30)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-21)
- PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-21)
Related notes:
Just putting my thoughts about derivation into the record:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Nov/0294.html
#g
The consolidation of "lax" into "imprecise", along with the new discussions, makes this section clearer.
Timothy Lebo, 2 Dec 2011, 17:52:25Display change log