ISSUE-9: dcat:Distribution and its subclasses are unnecessary
whyDistributionSubclasses
dcat:Distribution and its subclasses are unnecessary
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- DCAT
- Raised by:
- Phil Archer
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-26
- Description:
- This was raised by Ed Summers on the original eGov system where it is issue 39
http://www.w3.org/egov/IG/track/issues/39 - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [dcat] Distribution re-design proposal (from fadi.maali@deri.org on 2013-02-14)
- [dcat] Minutes of 2013-01-31 DCAT task force call (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-01-31)
- Fwd: [datacatalogs] Update re DCAT and catalog spec (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-10-26)
- Re: issues related to DCAT (from fadi.maali@deri.org on 2012-10-24)
- Re: issues related to DCAT (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-09-27)
- Re: issues related to DCAT (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2012-09-25)
- Re: issues related to DCAT (from bhyland@3roundstones.com on 2012-09-25)
- Re: issues related to DCAT (from dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com on 2012-09-25)
- issues related to DCAT (from fadi.maali@deri.org on 2012-09-25)
- Re: Invitation to revisit eGov-generated DCAT issues (from olyerickson@gmail.com on 2012-03-22)
- Invitation to revisit eGov-generated DCAT issues (from olyerickson@gmail.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: DCAT - issues related to dcat:Distribution (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2012-03-22)
- DCAT - issues related to dcat:Distribution (from fadi.maali@deri.org on 2012-03-22)
- Re: ISSUE-9 (whyDistributionSubclasses): dcat:Distribution and its subclasses are unnecessary [DCAT] (from sarven.capadisli@deri.org on 2012-02-23)
- ISSUE-9 (whyDistributionSubclasses): dcat:Distribution and its subclasses are unnecessary [DCAT] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-26)
Related notes:
Discussed 27/9/12 but not resolved. Move to OPEN
Phil Archer, 27 Sep 2012, 14:52:43Work in progress on a proposal: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Catalog_Vocabulary/AccessURLRedesign
Richard Cyganiak, 31 Jan 2013, 19:19:47[28 Feb] I don't see any problems with Fadi's proposal at: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Catalog_Vocabulary/AccessURLRedesign
John Erickson, 28 Feb 2013, 15:31:23This was resolved during the telco on 8 March 2013 http://www.w3.org/2013/03/08-gld-minutes.html
See resolutions regarding accessURL, landingPage and downloadURL, as well as resolution to stick with dcta:Distribution cf. resource
Display change log