ISSUE-37: Explanation of _:xyz pattern needs to be refined in RDFa Core
Clarifying bnode explanation
Explanation of _:xyz pattern needs to be refined in RDFa Core
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Mark Birbeck
- Opened on:
- 2010-07-29
- Description:
- There was a fairly heated discussion today on the RDFa WG telecon on how to explain what the "_" character does when used in a bnode as the prefix (e.g. _:foo). The discussion can be found here:
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-07-29#Heartbeat_working_drafts - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21 (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-23)
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21 (from nathan@webr3.org on 2010-10-23)
- Re: RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21 (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-23)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-10-21 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-21)
- Re: RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes (from Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl on 2010-10-21)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-21)
- RDFa Core Last Call telecon notes (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from nathan@webr3.org on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-20)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from nathan@webr3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-10-19)
- Re: Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from nathan@webr3.org on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-19)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-19)
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: Clarifying bnode explanation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-18)
- Telecon Agenda - October 21st 2010, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-18)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC (from Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl on 2010-10-14)
- RE: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC (from benjamin.adrian@dfki.de on 2010-10-14)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-14)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2010-10-14)
- Telecon Agenda - October 14th 2010, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-11)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from nathan@webr3.org on 2010-10-09)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-09)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-09)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-09)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-10-07)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-04)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-10-04)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-10-04)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-10-03)
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-10-03)
- PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-37: is _ a special prefix? or a URI? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-10-03)
- ISSUE-37: Explanation of _:xyz pattern needs to be refined in RDFa Core (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-07-29)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-37 - accept Ivan's edited changes to Mark's proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Oct/0231.html
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-10-21#resolution_3
Display change log