ISSUE-118: Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term

term syntax

Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term

State:

CLOSED

Product:

LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1

Raised by:

Ivan Herman

Opened on:

2011-11-16

Description:

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Nov/0100.html and the resulting thread

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118 (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-12-10)
2. Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118 (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-12-10)
3. Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118 (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-12-09)
4. Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE (ISSUE-118) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-22)
5. Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118 (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-11-17)
6. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-17)
7. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-17)
8. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-11-16)
9. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl on 2011-11-16)
10. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-16)
11. Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-16)
12. ISSUE-118 (term syntax): Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-16)

Related notes:

Display change log