ISSUE-101: Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals?
xsd:string coercion
Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2011-08-11
- Description:
- RDF WG has just issued a decision on the long-standing xsd:string vs.
plain literal debate:
http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2011/06/29/reconciling_various_forms_of_string_lite
Should we update RDFa 1.1 Core Processing Sequence to ensure that
anything typed as "xsd:string" generates a plain literal?
Raised in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Jun/0064.html
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-89 on Gregg Kellogg to Contact Richard in RDF WG about xsd:string coercion. - due 2011-08-25, closed- Related emails:
- Telecon Agenda - September 29th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-09-26)
- Telecon Agenda - September 22nd 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-09-18)
- Re: Plain vs. xsd:string literals in RDFa (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-23)
- Plain vs. xsd:string literals in RDFa (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-08-22)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC (from benjamin.adrian@dfki.de on 2011-08-18)
- Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-08-17)
- Re: ISSUE-101 (xsd:string coercion): Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-11)
- ISSUE-101 (xsd:string coercion): Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-11)
Related notes:
This issue is closed based on this resolution:
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-09-29#ISSUE__2d_101__3a__RDF_1__2e_1_and_plain_literals
The response was sent to the RDF WG:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Oct/0115.html
Display change log