ISSUE-48: Is DELETE too verbose?

Is DELETE too verbose?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Simon Schenk
Opened on:
2009-10-20
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from Souripriya.Das@oracle.com on 2010-08-09)
  2. SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-08-09)
  3. tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-07-26)
  4. Re: Example updates (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-12-21)
  5. Re: SPARQL TC 2009/11/24 Agenda (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-24)
  6. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-24)
  7. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-23)
  8. SPARQL TC 2009/11/24 Agenda (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-11-23)
  9. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-23)
  10. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-23)
  11. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-23)
  12. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-23)
  13. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-22)
  14. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-22)
  15. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-22)
  16. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-11-21)
  17. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-21)
  18. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-21)
  19. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from luke.wilson-mawer@garlik.com on 2009-11-10)
  20. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-10)
  21. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-10)
  22. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-10)
  23. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-10)
  24. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-09)
  25. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-09)
  26. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-09)
  27. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-09)
  28. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-09)
  29. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-09)
  30. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-09)
  31. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-09)
  32. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-09)
  33. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-09)
  34. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-08)
  35. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-08)
  36. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-08)
  37. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-08)
  38. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-08)
  39. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-08)
  40. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-08)
  41. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-07)
  42. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-06)
  43. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-06)
  44. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-06)
  45. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-06)
  46. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-06)
  47. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-11-05)
  48. Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-05)
  49. ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-11-04)
  50. Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-10-22)
  51. Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-10-20)
  52. Re: Update review (from alexandre.passant@deri.org on 2009-10-20)
  53. Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (from kjetil@kjernsmo.net on 2009-10-20)
  54. Re: Update review (from sschenk@uni-koblenz.de on 2009-10-20)
  55. ISSUE-48: Is DELETE too verbose? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-10-20)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 48.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:08 brett Exp $