ISSUE-43: should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or individual graphs?

should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or individual graphs?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Axel Polleres

Opened on:

2009-10-07

Description:

cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-10-06

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-07-26)
2. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2010-02-24)
3. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-02-24)
4. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-24)
5. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from sandro@w3.org on 2010-02-24)
6. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-23)
7. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-23)
8. Re: [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-02-23)
9. [TF-ENT] Agenda 24th Feb teleconf (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2010-02-21)
10. SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues. Feb. 16 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-15)
11. Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon today (from sandro@w3.org on 2009-11-13)
12. Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-10-07)
13. ISSUE-43: should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or individual graphs? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-10-07)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log