ACTION-618: Propose fix in definition of "in-scope" for BIND, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0120.html
Propose fix in definition of "in-scope" for BIND, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0120.html
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Axel Polleres
- Due on:
- May 22, 2012
- Created on:
- May 15, 2012
- Related emails:
- Re: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-26)
- RE: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel@polleres.net on 2012-05-26)
- RE: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
- RE: Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
- Re: Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
- Re: Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-23)
- Editorial remarks on the definition of in-scope (ACTION-618 - part 2) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
- Attemt to tackle in-scope BIND issue (ACTION-618 - part 1) (from axel.polleres@siemens.com on 2012-05-23)
- Re: SPARQL TC 2012-05-15 Agenda (from cbuil@fi.upm.es on 2012-05-15)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log.