14:55:55 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/09-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/09-sparql-irc ←
14:58:33 <kasei> Zakim?
Gregory Williams: Zakim? ←
14:58:43 <bglimm> What's wrong with Zakim?
Birte Glimm: What's wrong with Zakim? ←
14:58:53 <SteveH_> Zakim needs to be invited
Steve Harris: Zakim needs to be invited ←
14:58:56 <SteveH_> I don't remember how
Steve Harris: I don't remember how ←
14:59:07 <kasei> Zakim is in this channel already
Gregory Williams: Zakim is in this channel already ←
14:59:13 <SteveH_> ah, ok
Steve Harris: ah, ok ←
14:59:17 <SteveH_> Zakim, this is DAWG
Steve Harris: Zakim, this is DAWG ←
14:59:17 <Zakim> sorry, SteveH_, I do not see a conference named 'DAWG' in progress or scheduled at this time
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, SteveH_, I do not see a conference named 'DAWG' in progress or scheduled at this time ←
14:59:17 <AxelPolleres> Zaakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zaakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:59:23 <SteveH_> Zakim, this is SPARQL
Steve Harris: Zakim, this is SPARQL ←
14:59:23 <Zakim> ok, SteveH_; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, SteveH_; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
14:59:25 <Zakim> +dcharbon2
Zakim IRC Bot: +dcharbon2 ←
14:59:33 <kasei> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Gregory Williams: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:59:33 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2 ←
14:59:34 <AxelPolleres> seems, Zakim is fine
Axel Polleres: seems, Zakim is fine ←
14:59:40 <AxelPolleres> trackbot, start meeting
Axel Polleres: trackbot, start meeting ←
14:59:42 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
14:59:43 <kasei> good then. thanks steve.
Gregory Williams: good then. thanks steve. ←
14:59:44 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
14:59:45 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
14:59:45 <trackbot> Date: 09 February 2010
14:59:45 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute ←
14:59:59 <kasei> Zakim, mute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, mute me ←
14:59:59 <Zakim> sorry, kasei, I don't know what conference this is
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, kasei, I don't know what conference this is ←
15:00:04 <AxelPolleres> AxelPolleres has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-09
Axel Polleres: AxelPolleres has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-09 ←
15:00:33 <kasei> Zakim, this is SPARQL
Gregory Williams: Zakim, this is SPARQL ←
15:00:33 <Zakim> ok, kasei; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, kasei; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
15:00:37 <kasei> Zakim, mute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, mute me ←
15:00:39 <Zakim> kasei should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei should now be muted ←
15:00:43 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:00:44 <sandro> zakim, what is the code?
Sandro Hawke: zakim, what is the code? ←
15:00:51 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:00:57 <Zakim> the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), sandro ←
15:01:03 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: +AxelPolleres ←
15:01:07 <ivanH> zakim, dial ivanH-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivanH-voip ←
15:01:17 <Zakim> ok, ivanH; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivanH; the call is being made ←
15:01:20 <dcharbon2> zakim, mute me
David Charboneau: zakim, mute me ←
15:01:25 <Zakim> +Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←
15:01:31 <Zakim> -??P19
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P19 ←
15:01:43 <Zakim> dcharbon2 should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: dcharbon2 should now be muted ←
15:01:45 <Zakim> +??P22
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P22 ←
15:01:47 <AlexPassant> Zakim, ??P22 is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, ??P22 is me ←
15:01:55 <Zakim> +??P24
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P24 ←
15:02:05 <Zakim> +??P28
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P28 ←
15:02:05 <SteveH_> Zakim, ??P24 is [Garlik]
Steve Harris: Zakim, ??P24 is [Garlik] ←
15:02:09 <Zakim> +AlexPassant; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexPassant; got it ←
15:02:09 <MattPerry> zakim, ??p22 is me
Matthew Perry: zakim, ??p22 is me ←
15:02:11 <Zakim> +Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri ←
15:02:15 <Zakim> + +1.216.445.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.216.445.aaaa ←
15:02:15 <SteveH_> Zakim, [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM
Steve Harris: Zakim, [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM ←
15:02:20 <john-l> Zakim, aaaa is me.
John Clark: Zakim, aaaa is me. ←
15:02:22 <AndyS> zakim, hand up
Andy Seaborne: zakim, hand up ←
15:02:25 <Zakim> +??P32
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P32 ←
15:02:27 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:02:27 <LukeWM> #41 Axel
Luke Wilson-Mawer: #41 Axel ←
15:02:29 <Zakim> +[Garlik]; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +[Garlik]; got it ←
15:02:33 <Zakim> I already had ??P22 as AlexPassant, MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: I already had ??P22 as AlexPassant, MattPerry ←
15:02:34 <bglimm> Zakim, hand up
Birte Glimm: Zakim, hand up ←
15:02:35 <Zakim> +SteveH_, LukeWM; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH_, LukeWM; got it ←
15:02:37 <Zakim> +john-l; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +john-l; got it ←
15:02:43 <Zakim> I see AndyS on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see AndyS on the speaker queue ←
15:02:51 <AndyS> ack me
Andy Seaborne: ack me ←
15:02:54 <Zakim> +pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←
15:03:00 <Zakim> I see AndyS, bglimm on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see AndyS, bglimm on the speaker queue ←
15:03:07 <AxelPolleres> ack bglimm
Axel Polleres: ack bglimm ←
15:03:14 <AxelPolleres> ack AndyS
Axel Polleres: ack AndyS ←
15:03:25 <ivanH> zakim, mute me
Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me ←
15:03:30 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the �phone
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the �phone ←
15:03:32 <bglimm> ack me
Birte Glimm: ack me ←
15:03:40 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:03:45 <AlexPassant> ack me
Alexandre Passant: ack me ←
15:03:49 <AndyS> zakim, ??P32 is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P32 is me ←
15:03:50 <Zakim> +??P37
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P37 ←
15:03:52 <MattPerry> Zakim, ??P28 is me
Matthew Perry: Zakim, ??P28 is me ←
15:03:53 <AxelPolleres> ack bglimm
Axel Polleres: ack bglimm ←
15:03:57 <AlexPassant> Zakim, ack me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, ack me ←
15:04:14 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted ←
15:04:18 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the �phone', AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'who is on the �phone', AxelPolleres ←
15:04:18 <LukeWM> zakim, I'm confused, can you just assign all the codes to the right people please
Luke Wilson-Mawer: zakim, I'm confused, can you just assign all the codes to the right people please ←
15:04:31 <Souri> zakim, whio's on the phone?
Souripriya Das: zakim, whio's on the phone? ←
15:04:33 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:04:36 <AxelPolleres> ack AlexPassant
Axel Polleres: ack AlexPassant ←
15:04:38 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm, dcharbon2 (muted), AxelPolleres, Ivan (muted), AlexPassant, [Garlik], ??P28, Souri, john-l, ??P32, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm, dcharbon2 (muted), AxelPolleres, Ivan (muted), AlexPassant, [Garlik], ??P28, Souri, john-l, ??P32, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37 ←
15:04:41 <Zakim> [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM
Zakim IRC Bot: [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM ←
15:04:47 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
15:04:53 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry; got it ←
15:05:04 <Zakim> I see [Garlik] on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see [Garlik] on the speaker queue ←
15:05:04 <AxelPolleres> Prateek?
Axel Polleres: Prateek? ←
15:05:13 <Zakim> I don't understand you, LukeWM
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand you, LukeWM ←
15:05:14 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, Souri.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, Souri. ←
15:05:16 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm, dcharbon2 (muted), AxelPolleres, Ivan (muted), AlexPassant, [Garlik], MattPerry, Souri, john-l, AndyS, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm, dcharbon2 (muted), AxelPolleres, Ivan (muted), AlexPassant, [Garlik], MattPerry, Souri, john-l, AndyS, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37 ←
15:05:19 <Zakim> [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM
Zakim IRC Bot: [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM ←
15:05:32 <SteveH_> Zakim, ack [Garlik]
Steve Harris: Zakim, ack [Garlik] ←
15:05:34 <AxelPolleres> scribe: John Clark
(Scribe set to John Clark)
15:05:44 <john-l> scribenick: john-l
15:06:22 <Zakim> I see no one on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see no one on the speaker queue ←
15:06:27 <chimezie> Zakim, passcode?
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, passcode? ←
15:06:29 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Sorry about last week; things happen. But we have drafts published, and are already receiving feedback.
Axel Polleres: Sorry about last week; things happen. But we have drafts published, and are already receiving feedback. ←
15:06:34 <Zakim> the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), chimezie
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), chimezie ←
15:06:44 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-26
PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-26 ←
15:06:52 <AndyS> For next week: Regrets: AndyS
Andy Seaborne: For next week: Regrets: AndyS ←
15:07:13 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
15:07:16 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html ←
15:07:24 <Zakim> +Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: +Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
15:07:34 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html
PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html ←
15:07:41 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted ←
15:07:55 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html
RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-sparql-minutes.html ←
15:08:16 <ivanH> yes
Ivan Herman: yes ←
15:08:20 <ivanH> (sorry, muted)
Ivan Herman: (sorry, muted) ←
15:09:00 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to do minutes from last time in usual format, if possible
ACTION: Axel to do minutes from last time in usual format, if possible ←
15:09:00 <trackbot> Created ACTION-185 - Do minutes from last time in usual format, if possible [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-02-16].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-185 - Do minutes from last time in usual format, if possible [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-02-16]. ←
15:09:21 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Several comments have come in on the new draft.
Axel Polleres: Several comments have come in on the new draft. ←
15:09:41 <AxelPolleres> topic: comments
15:09:42 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
15:09:59 <AxelPolleres> RN-1
Axel Polleres: RN-1 ←
15:10:01 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html ←
15:10:08 <Zakim> +cory
Zakim IRC Bot: +cory ←
15:10:19 <Prateek> Zakim, Cory is Prateek
Prateek Jain: Zakim, Cory is Prateek ←
15:10:19 <Zakim> +Prateek; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Prateek; got it ←
15:10:27 <john-l> ...: Noone is assigned to comment, but a reply happened anyway.
...: Noone is assigned to comment, but a reply happened anyway. ←
15:10:40 <Prateek> Sorry I am latte. I am scribe. But it is very bad weather conditions here.
Prateek Jain: Sorry I am latte. I am scribe. But it is very bad weather conditions here. ←
15:10:43 <Prateek> late*
Prateek Jain: late* ←
15:10:44 <kasei> for comments like the brand new one from Rob Vesse that mix comments on multiple docs, should we split the assignment between the appropriate people?
Gregory Williams: for comments like the brand new one from Rob Vesse that mix comments on multiple docs, should we split the assignment between the appropriate people? ←
15:11:01 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Paul to follow up on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html and document on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
ACTION: Paul to follow up on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html and document on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
15:11:01 <trackbot> Created ACTION-186 - Follow up on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html and document on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-02-16].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-186 - Follow up on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0000.html and document on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-02-16]. ←
15:11:14 <Prateek> Scribe: Prateek
(Scribe set to Prateek Jain)
15:11:36 <john-l> ???: I have been following up, so there isn't as much urgency.
John Clark: ???: I have been following up, so there isn't as much urgency. ←
15:12:11 <john-l> s/???/pgearon/
John Clark: s/???/pgearon/ ←
15:12:20 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: steve to draft response on ED-1
ACTION: steve to draft response on ED-1 ←
15:12:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-187 - Draft response on ED-1 [on Steve Harris - due 2010-02-16].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-187 - Draft response on ED-1 [on Steve Harris - due 2010-02-16]. ←
15:13:04 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Please treat reactions to these comments as open action items, and update them accordingly.
Axel Polleres: Please treat reactions to these comments as open action items, and update them accordingly. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:13:10 <kasei> Axel, question about comment assignments (^^above^^)
Gregory Williams: Axel, question about comment assignments (^^above^^) ←
15:13:18 <AxelPolleres> q?
Axel Polleres: q? ←
15:13:18 <bglimm> I responded, will update the wiki
Birte Glimm: I responded, will update the wiki ←
15:13:21 <kasei> (sorry, muted)
Gregory Williams: (sorry, muted) ←
15:13:25 <kasei> Zakim, unmute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:13:25 <Zakim> kasei should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei should no longer be muted ←
15:13:53 <chimezie> i need to update the wiki re: my response as well
Chimezie Ogbuji: i need to update the wiki re: my response as well ←
15:13:54 <john-l> kasei: Should we split up some more recent comments that discuss several documents?
Gregory Williams: Should we split up some more recent comments that discuss several documents? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:14:19 <john-l> ...: In particular, a recent email discusses aggregates and other topics in one email.
John Clark: ...: In particular, a recent email discusses aggregates and other topics in one email. ←
15:15:09 <john-l> ...: I only focused on the service description commentary, but I can help to coordinate feedback.
John Clark: ...: I only focused on the service description commentary, but I can help to coordinate feedback. ←
15:15:44 <ivanH> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
15:15:46 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Greg to coordinate response to RV-2 (and record it on the comments page)
ACTION: Greg to coordinate response to RV-2 (and record it on the comments page) ←
15:15:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-188 - Coordinate response to RV-2 (and record it on the comments page) [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-02-16].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-188 - Coordinate response to RV-2 (and record it on the comments page) [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-02-16]. ←
15:16:11 <ivanH> zakim, unmute me
Ivan Herman: zakim, unmute me ←
15:16:11 <Zakim> Ivan should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should no longer be muted ←
15:16:21 <john-l> AxelPolleres: New PP document should address Jeremy's comment.
Axel Polleres: New PP document should address Jeremy's comment. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:16:23 <ivanH> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
15:17:39 <john-l> topic: Liasons
15:18:03 <kasei> Zakim, mute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, mute me ←
15:18:03 <Zakim> kasei should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei should now be muted ←
15:18:05 <AxelPolleres> sandro: now news from RIF
Sandro Hawke: now news from RIF [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
15:18:19 <AxelPolleres> not news from other groups either
Axel Polleres: not news from other groups either ←
15:18:20 <john-l> No news from the various Liasons.
John Clark: No news from the various Liasons. ←
15:18:32 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:18:32 <Zakim> bglimm was not muted, bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm was not muted, bglimm ←
15:18:37 <john-l> topic: FTF 3
15:18:38 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/F2F3
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/F2F3 ←
15:18:50 <dcharbon2> Zakim, unmute me
David Charboneau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:18:50 <Zakim> dcharbon2 should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: dcharbon2 should no longer be muted ←
15:19:12 <john-l> bglimm: Planning information up on the Wiki.
Birte Glimm: Planning information up on the Wiki. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:19:27 <john-l> AxelPolleres: All, please start updating that document with your plans where to attend.
Axel Polleres: All, please start updating that document with your plans where to attend. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:20:09 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
15:20:09 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
15:20:12 <AxelPolleres> topic: Query Issues
15:20:18 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Let's start discussing issues wrt query.
Axel Polleres: Let's start discussing issues wrt query. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:20:52 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3 ←
15:20:52 <john-l> AxelPolleres: I'd like to focus on issues 3, 4, 12, and 36.
Axel Polleres: I'd like to focus on issues 3, 4, 12, and 36. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:21:03 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Issue 3 is about subquery syntax.
Axel Polleres: ISSUE-3 is about subquery syntax. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:21:47 <john-l> ...: It seems there isn't a lot of dissention around this issue, so I suggest that we close it.
John Clark: ...: It seems there isn't a lot of dissention around this issue, so I suggest that we close it. ←
15:21:49 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-3 with the consensus that subqueries do not require a special "subquery keyword" but need to be put in mandatory curly braces
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-3 with the consensus that subqueries do not require a special "subquery keyword" but need to be put in mandatory curly braces ←
15:22:00 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:22:00 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm (muted), dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, [Garlik], MattPerry, Souri, john-l, AndyS, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37, Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei (muted), bglimm (muted), dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, [Garlik], MattPerry, Souri, john-l, AndyS, Sandro, pgearon, ??P37, Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
15:22:04 <Zakim> ... (muted), Prateek
Zakim IRC Bot: ... (muted), Prateek ←
15:22:04 <Zakim> [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM
Zakim IRC Bot: [Garlik] has SteveH_, LukeWM ←
15:22:05 <AxelPolleres> q?
Axel Polleres: q? ←
15:22:11 <ivanH> ack ivanH
Ivan Herman: ack ivanH ←
15:22:24 <SteveH_> seconded
Steve Harris: seconded ←
15:22:25 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
15:22:27 <AxelPolleres> ack ivanH
Axel Polleres: ack ivanH ←
15:22:28 <AxelPolleres> +1
Axel Polleres: +1 ←
15:22:28 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
15:22:30 <pgearon> +1
Paul Gearon: +1 ←
15:22:30 <dcharbon2> +1
David Charboneau: +1 ←
15:22:44 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-3 with the consensus that subqueries do not require a special "subquery keyword" but need to be put in mandatory curly braces
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-3 with the consensus that subqueries do not require a special "subquery keyword" but need to be put in mandatory curly braces ←
15:22:50 <AxelPolleres> close ISSUE-3
Axel Polleres: close ISSUE-3 ←
15:22:50 <trackbot> ISSUE-3 Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces) closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-3 Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces) closed ←
15:23:27 <john-l> ...: Issue 4: <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4>
John Clark: ...: ISSUE-4: <http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4> ←
15:23:29 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery.
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery. ←
15:23:41 <Souri> +1
Souripriya Das: +1 ←
15:23:42 <SteveH_> seconded
Steve Harris: seconded ←
15:23:44 <AxelPolleres> +1
Axel Polleres: +1 ←
15:23:45 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
15:23:47 <AndyS> and SELECT * means al variables visible at top of query?
Andy Seaborne: and SELECT * means al variables visible at top of query? ←
15:23:48 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
15:23:54 <dcharbon2> +1
David Charboneau: +1 ←
15:25:58 <john-l> Discussion clarifying SELECT *, agreement that it only "descends one level".
John Clark: Discussion clarifying SELECT *, agreement that it only "descends one level". ←
15:26:17 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Do we need to amend the proposed resolution?
Axel Polleres: Do we need to amend the proposed resolution? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:26:18 <AndyS> SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into subSELECT)
Andy Seaborne: SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into subSELECT) ←
15:26:25 <SteveH_> +1
Steve Harris: +1 ←
15:26:28 <bglimm> That's how I assumed it would be anyway
Birte Glimm: That's how I assumed it would be anyway ←
15:26:46 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED : Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery and SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into further subSELECTs)
Axel Polleres: PROPOSED : Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery and SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into further subSELECTs) ←
15:26:55 <dcharbon2> +1
David Charboneau: +1 ←
15:26:55 <AxelPolleres> +1
Axel Polleres: +1 ←
15:26:58 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
15:27:04 <pgearon> +1
Paul Gearon: +1 ←
15:27:10 <AndyS> Yes - so did I but the proposal talks about projected variables and we need to eb clear SELECT * works in the subSELECT as well
Andy Seaborne: Yes - so did I but the proposal talks about projected variables and we need to eb clear SELECT * works in the subSELECT as well ←
15:27:10 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery and SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into further subSELECTs)
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-4 with the consensus that only projected variables have scope outside a subquery and SELECT * calculates one level of variables (does not decend into further subSELECTs) ←
15:27:19 <Souri> +1 (decend => descend)
Souripriya Das: +1 (decend => descend) ←
15:28:15 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Next easy issue seems to be issue 12.
Axel Polleres: Next easy issue seems to be ISSUE-12. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:28:23 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12 ←
15:28:50 <ivanH> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
15:28:51 <SteveH_> actually current draft is ambiguious
Steve Harris: actually current draft is ambiguious ←
15:29:10 <AndyS> quoll?
Andy Seaborne: quoll? ←
15:29:47 <john-l> ivanH: The recent comment might change aggregation and make this issue moot.
Ivan Herman: The recent comment might change aggregation and make this issue moot. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:30:10 <john-l> ivanH: We shouldn't close it until we've addressed that comment.
Ivan Herman: We shouldn't close it until we've addressed that comment. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:30:22 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
15:30:27 <john-l> SteveH_: I think the two things are independent.
Steve Harris: I think the two things are independent. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:30:28 <ivanH> ack ivanH
Ivan Herman: ack ivanH ←
15:30:53 <kasei> yes
Gregory Williams: yes ←
15:31:40 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Could we close this with the understanding that we go forward with the syntax in the WD?
Axel Polleres: Could we close this with the understanding that we go forward with the syntax in the WD? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:32:01 <SteveH_> not in the WD, that's FILTER as it stands
Steve Harris: not in the WD, that's FILTER as it stands ←
15:32:06 <LukeWM> hears loud typing
Luke Wilson-Mawer: hears loud typing ←
15:32:10 <kasei> having trouble hearing you over the typing
Gregory Williams: having trouble hearing you over the typing ←
15:32:33 <AndyS> AndyS: Two parts: presense and synatx. Can we agree the need?
Andy Seaborne: Two parts: presense and synatx. Can we agree the need? [ Scribe Assist by Andy Seaborne ] ←
15:32:52 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1.
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1. ←
15:32:57 <SteveH_> no
Steve Harris: no ←
15:33:32 <kasei> +1
Gregory Williams: +1 ←
15:34:15 <john-l> AndyS: The draft is ambiguous in its wording.
Andy Seaborne: The draft is ambiguous in its wording. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:34:50 <AndyS> s/AndyS/SteveH/
Andy Seaborne: s/AndyS/SteveH/ ←
15:35:02 <kasei> maybe close this issue and open a new one regarding the syntax of this functionality?
Gregory Williams: maybe close this issue and open a new one regarding the syntax of this functionality? ←
15:36:28 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Can we agree that we need this functionality, but are still undecided about the syntax?
Axel Polleres: Can we agree that we need this functionality, but are still undecided about the syntax? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:37:01 <AxelPolleres> strawpoll: Shall we go along with HAVING as the keyword for filtering based on aggregate values
STRAWPOLL: Shall we go along with HAVING as the keyword for filtering based on aggregate values ←
15:37:05 <SteveH_> +1
Steve Harris: +1 ←
15:37:07 <kasei> i still prefer 'FILTER' over 'HAVING', but my resolve is shrinking as time goes on.
Gregory Williams: i still prefer 'FILTER' over 'HAVING', but my resolve is shrinking as time goes on. ←
15:37:11 <chimezie> +1
Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 ←
15:37:14 <Souri> +1
Souripriya Das: +1 ←
15:37:15 <MattPerry> +1
Matthew Perry: +1 ←
15:37:22 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
15:37:25 <kasei> Zakim, unmute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:37:25 <Zakim> kasei should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei should no longer be muted ←
15:37:28 <AlexPassant> +1
Alexandre Passant: +1 ←
15:37:30 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
15:38:22 <john-l> kasei: I simply prefer using the 'FILTER' term over 'HAVING'.
Gregory Williams: I simply prefer using the 'FILTER' term over 'HAVING'. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:38:38 <john-l> ...: ... but with the same syntax as others have presented.
John Clark: ...: ... but with the same syntax as others have presented. ←
15:39:04 <john-l> AxelPolleres: But you might need to apply different conditions to the different terms.
Axel Polleres: But you might need to apply different conditions to the different terms. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:39:25 <Souri> To me HAVING seems a much clearer way than having to say use FILTER with such and such restrictions
Souripriya Das: To me HAVING seems a much clearer way than having to say use FILTER with such and such restrictions ←
15:39:49 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Do we still have resistance to just using 'HAVING'?
Axel Polleres: Do we still have resistance to just using 'HAVING'? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:39:53 <kasei> 0
15:40:03 <kasei> Zakim, mute me
Gregory Williams: Zakim, mute me ←
15:40:03 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1.
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1. ←
15:40:04 <Zakim> kasei should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei should now be muted ←
15:40:26 <AxelPolleres> +1
Axel Polleres: +1 ←
15:40:29 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
15:40:32 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
15:40:36 <pgearon> +1
Paul Gearon: +1 ←
15:40:53 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1.
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-12 by consensus of the need for the functionality provided by the HAVING clause as sketched in the latest WD of Query 1.1. ←
15:41:21 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/36 ←
15:41:21 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Next up, issue 36.
Axel Polleres: Next up, ISSUE-36. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:42:18 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing projected with the same name as an existing variable (throwing a static error).
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing projected with the same name as an existing variable (throwing a static error). ←
15:42:48 <AndyS> "variable for select expression"
Andy Seaborne: "variable for select expression" ←
15:43:38 <AndyS> Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the pattern of the SELECT.
Andy Seaborne: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the pattern of the SELECT. ←
15:44:45 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:44:45 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted ←
15:44:54 <chimezie> shouldn't that be a noop?
Chimezie Ogbuji: shouldn't that be a noop? ←
15:46:09 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing a variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the WHERE pattern of that SELECT.
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing a variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the WHERE pattern of that SELECT. ←
15:46:10 <AndyS> Sorry - getting me words mixed up
Andy Seaborne: Sorry - getting me words mixed up ←
15:47:01 <john-l> AxelPolleres: We allow left-to-right chaining for variables in the WHERE clause, correct?
Axel Polleres: We allow left-to-right chaining for variables in the WHERE clause, correct? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:47:22 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
15:47:22 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted ←
15:47:32 <AxelPolleres> +1
Axel Polleres: +1 ←
15:47:38 <SteveH_> +1
Steve Harris: +1 ←
15:47:41 <kasei> so this wouldn't say anything abotu this, right? (1 as ?x) (1 as ?x)
Gregory Williams: so this wouldn't say anything abotu this, right? (1 as ?x) (1 as ?x) ←
15:47:46 <dcharbon2> +1
David Charboneau: +1 ←
15:48:08 <john-l> AxelPolleres: That's covered in the current spec.
Axel Polleres: That's covered in the current spec. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:48:11 <kasei> right, yeah.
Gregory Williams: right, yeah. ←
15:48:24 <kasei> I'm +1 on either way, but wanted to clarify.
Gregory Williams: I'm +1 on either way, but wanted to clarify. ←
15:48:28 <SteveH_> yeah, kasei's case is covered
Steve Harris: yeah, kasei's case is covered ←
15:48:36 <kasei> good. thanks, AndyS.
Gregory Williams: good. thanks, AndyS. ←
15:48:37 <john-l> AxelPolleres: I think that's handled by binding override.
Axel Polleres: I think that's handled by binding override. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:48:43 <john-l> AndyS: No, that's an error in the current doc.
Andy Seaborne: No, that's an error in the current doc. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:49:29 <kasei> if it's already covered by the doc, I think the proposal as worded is good.
Gregory Williams: if it's already covered by the doc, I think the proposal as worded is good. ←
15:50:10 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
15:50:18 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing a variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the WHERE pattern of that SELECT.
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-36 by disallowing a variable used with AS for select expression if it already occurs in the WHERE pattern of that SELECT. ←
15:50:48 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0222.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0222.html ←
15:51:01 <john-l> AxelPolleres: We can work off this summary list for further issues.
Axel Polleres: We can work off this summary list for further issues. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:51:27 <AndyS> This is only query issues. I skipped non-query issues.
Andy Seaborne: This is only query issues. I skipped non-query issues. ←
15:52:20 <john-l> AxelPolleres: Issue 8 is also marked as done, so let's address that.
Axel Polleres: ISSUE-8 is also marked as done, so let's address that. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:52:22 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8 ←
15:52:38 <john-l> AxelPolleres: There are some comments on that on the ML.
Axel Polleres: There are some comments on that on the ML. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:53:00 <AndyS> q+ to say I think my summary is incomplete
Andy Seaborne: q+ to say I think my summary is incomplete ←
15:53:49 <john-l> AxelPolleres: You might use FROM clauses in subqueries to do graph merging.
Axel Polleres: You might use FROM clauses in subqueries to do graph merging. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:53:57 <AxelPolleres> q?
Axel Polleres: q? ←
15:54:04 <john-l> AxelPolleres: It might be ok to restrict it for subselects, though.
Axel Polleres: It might be ok to restrict it for subselects, though. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:54:17 <AxelPolleres> ack AndyS
Axel Polleres: ack AndyS ←
15:54:17 <Zakim> AndyS, you wanted to say I think my summary is incomplete
Zakim IRC Bot: AndyS, you wanted to say I think my summary is incomplete ←
15:54:36 <john-l> AndyS: LeeF was also indicating that this would be relevant for update.
Andy Seaborne: LeeF was also indicating that this would be relevant for update. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:54:46 <AxelPolleres> related to Dataset descriptions in update?
Axel Polleres: related to Dataset descriptions in update? ←
15:54:52 <john-l> SteveH_: We're only talking about queries, though, so this might not be relevant.
Steve Harris: We're only talking about queries, though, so this might not be relevant. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:55:52 <john-l> AxelPolleres: As a basis, the default dataset is inherited.
Axel Polleres: As a basis, the default dataset is inherited. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:56:20 <john-l> ...: Is it orthogonal to consider whether FROM clauses are allowed in subqueries?
John Clark: ...: Is it orthogonal to consider whether FROM clauses are allowed in subqueries? ←
15:56:23 <AxelPolleres> currently, no FROM/FROM NAME allowed in Query 1.1
Axel Polleres: currently, no FROM/FROM NAME allowed in Query 1.1 ←
15:56:31 <SteveH_> ...subqueries
Steve Harris: ...subqueries ←
15:57:04 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0222.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0222.html ←
15:57:18 <john-l> AxelPolleres: We are not able to close issue 8 at this time.
Axel Polleres: We are not able to close ISSUE-8 at this time. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:57:23 <john-l> ...: Let's move to issue 15.
John Clark: ...: Let's move to ISSUE-15. ←
15:57:42 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/15
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/15 ←
15:58:18 <john-l> AxelPolleres: No special form for aggregates, just use function call syntax.
Axel Polleres: No special form for aggregates, just use function call syntax. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:58:47 <AndyS> There is a synatx issue of "my:agg(DISTINCT ?x)"
Andy Seaborne: There is a synatx issue of "my:agg(DISTINCT ?x)" ←
15:59:04 <AxelPolleres> current assumption is that normal functions and aggregates are disjoint?
Axel Polleres: current assumption is that normal functions and aggregates are disjoint? ←
15:59:09 <AndyS> I *think* this is OK but I have not had time to check.
Andy Seaborne: I *think* this is OK but I have not had time to check. ←
15:59:31 <AxelPolleres> q?
Axel Polleres: q? ←
15:59:33 <john-l> AxelPolleres: When would the DISTINCT keyword be allowed?
Axel Polleres: When would the DISTINCT keyword be allowed? [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
15:59:43 <AndyS> There will be some parser dancing - extra rules for function call to avoid.
Andy Seaborne: There will be some parser dancing - extra rules for function call to avoid. ←
16:00:04 <SteveH_> AndyS, yes, the syntax will be a bit murky
Steve Harris: AndyS, yes, the syntax will be a bit murky ←
16:00:08 <sandro> Bye folks, RIF meeting starts now.
Sandro Hawke: Bye folks, RIF meeting starts now. ←
16:00:19 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
16:00:22 <dcharbon2> I have a hard stop at 11, bye guys
David Charboneau: I have a hard stop at 11, bye guys ←
16:00:41 <Zakim> -dcharbon2
Zakim IRC Bot: -dcharbon2 ←
16:00:55 <john-l> AxelPolleres: We can't reach an official resolution for issue 15.
Axel Polleres: We can't reach an official resolution for ISSUE-15. [ Scribe Assist by John Clark ] ←
16:01:15 <Zakim> -Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: -Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
16:02:27 <AxelPolleres> andyS: extensible aggregates... problematic to check statically whether being used in FILTERs (if we agree to disallow that)?
Andy Seaborne: extensible aggregates... problematic to check statically whether being used in FILTERs (if we agree to disallow that)? [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
16:02:47 <Zakim> -IvanH
Zakim IRC Bot: -IvanH ←
16:02:49 <Zakim> -AlexPassant
Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexPassant ←
16:03:29 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
16:04:17 <AxelPolleres> definitions need to settle around that, adjourned for today, thanks everybody.
Axel Polleres: definitions need to settle around that, adjourned for today, thanks everybody. ←
16:04:18 <LukeWM> bye
Luke Wilson-Mawer: bye ←
16:04:20 <Zakim> -MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry ←
16:04:24 <MattPerry> bye
Matthew Perry: bye ←
16:04:26 <AndyS> ADJOURNED
Andy Seaborne: ADJOURNED ←
16:04:28 <Zakim> -john-l
Zakim IRC Bot: -john-l ←
16:04:29 <Zakim> -Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri ←
16:04:29 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres ←
16:04:29 <AndyS> Woo - issues closed
Andy Seaborne: Woo - issues closed ←
16:04:30 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
16:04:33 <Zakim> -kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←
16:04:43 <Zakim> -Prateek
Zakim IRC Bot: -Prateek ←
16:04:47 <Zakim> -pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←
16:05:00 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public
Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public ←
16:05:11 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, attendees?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, attendees? ←
16:05:11 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, AxelPolleres.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, AxelPolleres. ←
16:05:18 <AxelPolleres> regrets: LeeF
16:05:29 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, list attendees
Axel Polleres: Zakim, list attendees ←
16:05:29 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, Souri, +1.216.445.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH_, LukeWM, john-l, pgearon, AndyS,
Zakim IRC Bot: As of this point the attendees have been kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, Souri, +1.216.445.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH_, LukeWM, john-l, pgearon, AndyS, ←
16:05:30 <AndyS> pgearon - What prioritization of issue do you have? Any interaction with query?
Andy Seaborne: pgearon - What prioritization of issue do you have? Any interaction with query? ←
16:05:32 <Zakim> ... MattPerry, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Prateek
Zakim IRC Bot: ... MattPerry, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Prateek ←
16:05:51 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public
Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public ←
16:06:44 <AxelPolleres> Pgaeron, all editors would be good if you could send a priotity list like Steve/Andy, Greg, Birte did to the list
Axel Polleres: Pgaeron, all editors would be good if you could send a priotity list like Steve/Andy, Greg, Birte did to the list ←
16:06:54 <AxelPolleres> Thanks
Axel Polleres: Thanks ←
16:12:53 <Zakim> -??P37
(No events recorded for 5 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P37 ←
16:35:01 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, [Garlik], in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
(No events recorded for 22 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, [Garlik], in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
16:35:03 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
16:35:04 <Zakim> Attendees were kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, Souri, +1.216.445.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH_, LukeWM, john-l, pgearon, AndyS, MattPerry, Chimezie_Ogbuji,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were kasei, bglimm, dcharbon2, AxelPolleres, Ivan, AlexPassant, Souri, +1.216.445.aaaa, Sandro, SteveH_, LukeWM, john-l, pgearon, AndyS, MattPerry, Chimezie_Ogbuji, ←
16:35:07 <Zakim> ... Prateek
Zakim IRC Bot: ... Prateek ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2010-02-09 16:44:05 UTC by 'apollere2', comments: None