Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference

 

 

<trackbot> Date: 18 November 2009

<silvia> quick discussion amongst Raphael, Erik, Davy and Silvia

<silvia> F2F: when should we have it?

<scribe> Scribe: raphael

1. Next F2F meeting

Silvia: I don't know if I would be able to make it
... if we need another f2f, better make it earlier than later

Erik: same thing here, we will go to Media Annotations anyway

Silvia: it is still a long flight but better than Europe

Erik: time zone are convenient also for Conrad and Silvia

2. Specification Document

Raphael: I will put a small table with the key formats in Section 3.1
... key audio and video codecs + container formats
... much smaller table
... second editorial note, add the case that we can foresee smart media caches
... that will handle range request in other units than bytes
... my final editorial note in Section 3.5

Silvia: I don't see the difference with what you wrote
... my emphasis is also on byte identity and no complexity

Davy: I agree, we do not define complexity

Raphael: should we care about making a URI template in complement of the BNF syntax

Silvia: we have discussed that already, the conclusion is NO, we do not care
... the BNF syntax is sufficient

<silvia> URI templates are an alternative to BNF syntax, so I don't think we need to take care of them

<erik> good luck on doc!!!

3. AOB

Raphael: that was a short telecon, I continue to work on the document so we have more meat to discuss next week

[adjourned]