ISSUE-195: Camelli a cipher
Camelli a cipher
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- XML Security - General
- Raised by:
- Frederick Hirsch
- Opened on:
- 2010-03-18
- Description:
- We have a comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1.
We strongly think that the Camelli a cipher should be adopted
by not only Cross-Reference but alsoXML Encryption 1.1.
Because the Camellia cipher is described in RFC4051, which is Standard
track RFC.
Does this have any problems?
Of course, current Cross-Reference document already includes the
Camellia cipher.
For your information, Camellia has been already adopted in TLS,
IPsec, S/MIME, OpenPGPG, Kerberos (plans), and other standards.
In addition, as open source software, Camellia is loaded to OpenSSL,
Firefox, Linux, FreeBSD, MIT Kerberos KRB5 (scheduled), and so on.
For more information on Camellia cipher, please see at;
http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/crypt/eng/camellia/index.html - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-546 on Frederick Hirsch to Respond regarding ISSUE-134 - due 2010-04-06, closed- Related emails:
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-29 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2010-06-28)
- Re: Comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1 (from anders.rundgren@telia.com on 2010-04-08)
- Re: Comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2010-04-08)
- Re: Comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1 (from anders.rundgren@telia.com on 2010-04-08)
- Re: Comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1 (from kanno.satoru@po.ntts.co.jp on 2010-04-08)
- Re: Comment for the latest Working Draft of Encryption 1.1 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2010-04-06)
- Draft Minutes 2010-03-30 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2010-03-30)
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-03-30 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2010-03-29)
- ISSUE-195: Camelli a cipher [Enc11 and Sig11 and Security Algorithms Summary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-03-18)
Related notes:
See also ISSUE-134.
Frederick Hirsch, 6 Apr 2010, 21:48:33[fjh]: resolved, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Apr/0006.html
29 Jun 2010, 15:22:40[fjh]: see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Apr/0001.html for resolution, for ISSUE-195 and ISSUE-196
29 Jun 2010, 15:23:34Display change log