ISSUE-135: Review transforms for XML Encryption 1.1 and alignment with Signature 1.1

Review transforms for XML Encryption 1.1 and alignment with Signature 1.1

State:

CLOSED

Product:

XML Encryption 1.1

Raised by:

Frederick Hirsch

Opened on:

2009-06-09

Description:

Related Actions Items:

Related emails:

Re: Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-08)
Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM on 2009-10-06)
Re: Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at on 2009-10-06)
Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-02)
Proposal - no change needed to XML Encryption to add Transforms to algorithm section (ISSUE-135) (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-02)
Re: Sept 29 Meeting Minutes (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-29)
Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-09-29 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
Re: Transforms for XML Encryption - propose to close ISSUE-135 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
Transforms for XML Encryption - propose to close ISSUE-135 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
approved minutes from 9 June 2009 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-06-16)
updated minutes for review, approval today (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-06-16)

Raised during June 2009 F2F on topic of aligning 1.1 XML Signature and XML Encryption

From minutes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec/2009Jun/att-0009/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#item07

<fjh> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview.htm#sec-CipherReference
Magnus: nothing in particular in mind
... we don't have a transform element , should there be one?
<fjh> "The syntax of the URI and Transforms is similar to that of"
Frederick: may need to review this more
<fjh> issue: review transforms for encryption
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-135 - Review transforms for encryption ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/135/edit .

Mail from Magnus stated:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009May/0054.html

- XMLEnc does not mention transform algorithms (but should probably given
the CipherReference type, see XMLEnc Section 3.3.1). If the group
agrees that it should, I guess the same normative statements as are in
XMLDsig 1.1 with regards to transforms should apply?

Frederick Hirsch, 1 Oct 2009, 21:58:18