Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
LC3 Responses/KK1
To: kaljurand@gmail.com
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Subject: [LC response] To Kaarel Kaljurand
Dear Kaarel,
Thank you for your comment
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Oct/0020.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
Thank you very much for spotting this. We corrected these typos. Find the diff at [1].
[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=26062&oldid=26052
Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
Regards,
Sebastian Rudolph
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.
PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL
Hi, I've just noticed that the OWL/XML of the "The Complete Sample Ontology" in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer contains a misplaced angle bracket: IS: <Ontology xml:base="http://example.com/owl/families/" ontologyIRI="http://example.com/owl/families"> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" SHOULD BE: <Ontology xml:base="http://example.com/owl/families/" ontologyIRI="http://example.com/owl/families" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"> -- kaarel