Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
View source for Document Overview

Jump to: navigation, search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, 106, 41712-chairs.
You can view and copy the source of this page.
__NUMBEREDHEADINGS__
{{#css:CSS/datatable.css}}
{{TR|title=Document Overview}}
<div id='editors'>
; Editors:
: W3C OWL Working Group (see [[#ack|Acknowledgements]])
</div>
; Abstract:
: <div id='abstract'><p>The OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, informally OWL 2, is an ontology language for the Semantic Web with formally defined meaning. OWL 2 ontologies provide classes, properties, individuals, and data values and are stored as Semantic Web documents. OWL 2 ontologies can be used along with information written in RDF, and OWL 2 ontologies themselves are primarily exchanged as RDF documents.</p><p>This document serves as an introduction to OWL 2 and the various other OWL 2 documents.  It describes the syntaxes for OWL 2, the different kinds of semantics, the available profiles (sub-languages), and the relationship between OWL 1 and OWL 2.</p></div>
; Status of this Document

{{:Shared_Copyright}}

<div id='docbody'>
<html>
</p>
<script type="text/javascript">/*<![CDATA[*/

function show_short_toc() {
    set_display_by_class('li','toclevel-3','none');
    set_display_by_id('short-toc','none');
    set_display_by_id('full-toc','');
}

function show_full_toc() {
    set_display_by_class('li','toclevel-3','');
    set_display_by_id('short-toc','');
    set_display_by_id('full-toc','none');
}

/*]]>*/</script>
<p>
</html>
__TOC__

== Introduction ==

This document provides a non-normative high-level overview of the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language and serves as a roadmap for the documents that define and describe OWL 2. 

Ontologies are formalized vocabularies of terms, often covering a specific domain and shared by a community of users. They specify the definitions of terms by describing their relationships with other terms in the ontology. OWL 2 is an extension and revision of the [http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/ OWL Web Ontology Language] developed by the [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ W3C Web Ontology Working Group] and published in 2004 (referred to hereafter as “OWL 1”).  OWL 2 is being developed (and this document was written) by a follow-on group, the [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/ W3C OWL Working Group].  Like OWL 1, OWL 2 is designed to facilitate ontology development and sharing via the Web, with the ultimate goal of making Web content more accessible to machines.

== Overview ==

Figure 1 gives an overview of the OWL 2 language, showing its main building blocks and how they relate to each other. The ellipse in the center represents the abstract notion of an ontology, which can be thought of either as an abstract structure or as an RDF graph (see [[#sec-ont|2.1 Ontologies]]). At the top are various concrete syntaxes (see [[#sec-syn|2.2 Syntaxes]]) that can be used to serialize and exchange ontologies. At the bottom are the two semantic specifications that define the meaning of OWL 2 ontologies (see [[#sec-sem|2.3 Semantics]]).

Most users of OWL 2 will need only one syntax and one semantics; for them, this diagram would be much simpler, with only their one syntax at the top, their one semantics at the bottom, and rarely a need to see what's inside the ellipse in the center.

<div class="image">
[[Image:OWL2-structure2-800.png|Diagram showing that each syntax maps to/from ontologies and ontologies have two semantics]]<br />
<span class="caption">Figure 1.</span> The Structure of OWL 2
</div>


<div id="sec-ont">

=== Ontologies ===

The conceptual structure of OWL 2 ontologies is defined in the OWL 2 Structural Specification document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-specification|OWL 2 Structural Specification]]</cite>]. This document uses UML [<cite>[[#ref-uml|UML]]</cite>] to define the structural elements available in OWL 2, explaining their roles and functionalities in abstract terms and without reference to any particular syntax. It also defines the functional-style syntax, which closely follows the structural specification and allows OWL 2 ontologies to be written in a compact form.

Any OWL 2 ontology can also be viewed as an RDF graph. The relationship between these two views is specified by the Mapping to RDF Graphs document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-rdf-mapping|OWL 2 RDF Mapping]]</cite>], which defines a mapping from the structural form to the RDF graph form, and vice versa. The OWL 2 Quick Reference Guide [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-quick-reference|OWL 2 Quick Guide]]</cite>] provides a simple overview of these two views of OWL 2, laid out side by side.

</div>
<div id="sec-syn">

=== Syntaxes ===

In practice, a concrete syntax is needed in order to store OWL 2 ontologies and to exchange them among tools and applications. The primary exchange syntax for OWL 2 is RDF/XML [<cite>[[#ref-rdf-syntax|RDF Syntax]]</cite>]; this is indeed the only syntax that ''must'' be supported by all OWL 2 tools (see Section 2.1 of the OWL 2 Conformance document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-conformance|OWL 2 Conformance]]</cite>]).

While RDF/XML provides for interoperability among OWL 2 tools, other concrete syntaxes may also be used. These include alternative RDF serializations, such as Turtle [<cite>[[#ref-turtle|Turtle]]</cite>]; an XML serialization [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-xml-serialization|OWL 2 XML]]</cite>]; and a more "readable" syntax, called the Manchester Syntax [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-manchester-syntax|OWL 2 Manchester Syntax]]</cite>], that is used in several ontology editing tools. Finally, the functional-style syntax can also be used for serialization, although its  main purpose is specifying the structure of the language [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-specification|OWL 2 Structural Specification]]</cite>].


<div style="padding: 0 1em 0 2em;">
{| class="open-data-table"
!Name of Syntax!!Specification!!Status!!Purpose
|-
|RDF/XML
|[[Mapping to RDF Graphs]],<br/>[http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/ RDF/XML]
|Mandatory
|Interchange (can be written and read by all conformant OWL 2 software)
|-
|OWL/XML
|[[XML Serialization]]
|Optional
|Easier to process using XML tools
|-
|Functional Syntax
|[[Syntax|Structural Specification]]
|Optional
|Easier to see the formal structure of ontologies
|-
|Manchester Syntax
|[[ManchesterSyntax|Manchester Syntax]]
|Optional
|Easier to read/write DL Ontologies
|-
|Turtle
|[[Mapping to RDF Graphs]],<br/>[http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ Turtle]
|Optional, Not from OWL-WG
|Easier to read/write RDF triples
|}
</div>

</div>

<div id="sec-sem">

=== Semantics ===

The OWL 2 Structural Specification document defines the abstract structure of OWL 2 ontologies, but it does not define their meaning. The Direct Semantics [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-direct-semantics|OWL 2 Direct Semantics]]</cite>] and the RDF-Based Semantics [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics|OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics]]</cite>] provide two alternative ways of assigning meaning to OWL 2 ontologies, with a correspondence theorem providing a link between the two.  These two semantics are used by reasoners and other tools, e.g., to answer class consistency, subsumption and instance retrieval queries.

The Direct Semantics assigns meaning directly to ontology structures, resulting in a semantics compatible with the model theoretic semantics of the ''SROIQ'' description logic&mdash;a fragment of first order logic with useful computational properties. The advantage of this close connection is that the extensive description logic literature and implementation experience can be directly exploited by OWL 2 tools. However, some conditions must be placed on ontology structures in order to ensure that they can be translated into a ''SROIQ'' knowledge base; for example, transitive properties cannot be used in number restrictions (see [[Syntax#Ontologies|Section 3]] of the OWL 2 Structural Specification document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-specification|OWL 2 Structural Specification]]</cite>] for a complete list of these conditions).  Ontologies that satisfy these syntactic conditions are called ''OWL 2 DL'' ontologies. "OWL 2 DL" is used informally to refer to OWL 2 DL ontologies interpreted using the Direct Semantics [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-direct-semantics|OWL 2 Direct Semantics]]</cite>].

The RDF-Based Semantics [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics|OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics]]</cite>] assigns meaning directly to RDF graphs and so indirectly to ontology structures via the Mapping to RDF graphs. The RDF-Based Semantics is fully compatible with the RDF Semantics [<cite>[[#ref-rdf-semantics|RDF Semantics]]</cite>], and extends the semantic conditions defined for RDF.  The RDF-Based Semantics can be applied to ''any'' OWL 2 Ontology, without restrictions, as any OWL 2 Ontology can be mapped to RDF. "OWL 2 Full" is used informally to refer to RDF graphs considered as OWL 2 ontologies and interpreted using the RDF-Based Semantics.

The correspondence theorem in [[RDF-Based_Semantics#Correspondence_Theorem|Section 7.2]] of the RDF-Based Semantics Document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics|OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics]]</cite>]) defines a precise, close relationship between the Direct and RDF-Based Semantics. This theorem states, in essence, that given an OWL 2 DL ontology, inferences drawn using the Direct Semantics will still be valid if the ontology is mapped into an RDF graph ''and'' interpreted using the RDF-Based Semantics.

</div>

<div id="sec-prof">

=== Profiles ===

OWL 2 Profiles [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-profiles|OWL 2 Profiles]]</cite>] are sub-languages (syntactic subsets) of OWL 2 that offer important advantages in particular application scenarios. Three different profiles are defined: OWL 2 EL, OWL 2 QL, and OWL 2 RL. Each profile is defined as a ''syntactic restriction'' of the OWL 2 Structural Specification, i.e., as a subset of the structural elements that can be used in a conforming ontology, and each is more restrictive than OWL DL.  Each of the profiles trades off different aspects of OWL's expressive power in return for different computational and/or implementational benefits.

'''OWL 2 EL''' enables polynomial time algorithms for all the standard reasoning tasks; it is particularly suitable for applications where very large ontologies are needed, and where expressive power can be traded for performance guarantees. '''OWL 2 QL''' enables conjunctive queries to be answered in LogSpace (more precisely, AC<sup>0</sup>) using standard relational database technology; it is particularly suitable for applications where relatively lightweight ontologies are used to organize large numbers of individuals and where it is useful or necessary to access the data directly via relational queries (e.g., SQL). '''OWL 2 RL''' enables the implementation of polynomial time reasoning algorithms using rule-extended database technologies operating directly on RDF triples; it is particularly suitable for applications where relatively lightweight ontologies are used to organize large numbers of individuals and where it is useful or necessary to operate directly on data in the form of RDF triples. 

Any OWL 2 EL, QL or RL ontology is, of course, also an OWL 2 ontology and can be interpreted using either the Direct or RDF-Based Semantics. When using OWL 2 RL, a rule-based implementation can operate directly on RDF triples and so can be applied to an arbitrary RDF graph, i.e., to any OWL 2 ontology. In this case, reasoning will always be ''sound'' (that is, only correct answers to queries will be computed), but it may not be ''complete'' (that is, it is not guaranteed that all correct answers to queries will be computed). Theorem PR1 of the Profiles document states, however, that (in general) when the ontology is consistent with the structural definition of OWL 2 RL, a suitable rule-based implementation performing ground atomic queries will be both sound and complete.

</div>

== Relationship to OWL 1 ==

OWL 2 has a very similar overall structure to OWL 1. Looking at Figure 1, almost all the building blocks of OWL 2 were present in OWL 1, albeit possibly under different names.

The central role of RDF/XML, the role of other syntaxes, and the relationships between the Direct and RDF-Based semantics (i.e., the correspondence theorem) have not changed. More importantly, backwards compatibility with OWL 1 is, to all intents and purposes, complete: all OWL 1 Ontologies remain valid OWL 2 Ontologies, with identical inferences in all practical cases (see [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale#Backward_Compatibility Section 4.2] of OWL 2 New Features and Rationale [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-new-features|OWL 2 New Features and Rationale]]</cite>]).

OWL 2 adds new functionality with respect to OWL 1.  Some of the new
features are syntactic sugar (e.g., disjoint union of classes) while
others offer new expressivity, including:

* keys;
* property chains;
* richer datatypes, data ranges;
* qualified cardinality restrictions;
* asymmetric, reflexive, and disjoint properties; and
* enhanced annotation capabilities

OWL 2 also defines three new profiles [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-profiles|OWL 2 Profiles]]</cite>] and a new syntax [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-manchester-syntax|OWL 2 Manchester Syntax]]</cite>]. In addition, some of the restrictions applicable to OWL DL have been relaxed; as a result, the set of RDF Graphs that can be handled by Description Logics reasoners is slightly larger in OWL 2.

All of the above is documented in detail in the OWL 2 New Features and Rationale document [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-new-features|OWL 2 New Features and Rationale]]</cite>]. The OWL 2 Quick Reference Guide [<cite>[[#ref-owl-2-quick-reference|OWL 2 Quick Guide]]</cite>] also provides an overview of the features of OWL 2, clearly indicating those that are new.

== Documentation Roadmap ==

The OWL 2 ontology language is normatively defined by five core specification documents describing its conceptual structure, primary exchange syntax (RDF/XML), two alternative semantics (Direct and RDF-Based), and conformance requirements. Three additional specification documents describe optional features that may be supported by some implementations: the language profiles, and two alternative concrete syntaxes (OWL/XML and Manchester).

These documents are, however, all rather technical and mainly aimed at OWL 2 implementers and tool developers. Those looking for a more approachable guide to the features and usage of OWL 2 may prefer to consult one of the user documents (Primer, New Features and Rationale, and Quick Reference Guide).
{{:Roadmap}}

<div id="changelog">
== Appendix: Change Log (Informative) ==

=== Changes Since Recommendation ===

This section summarizes the changes to this document since the [http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027/ Recommendation of 27 October 2009].

* With the publication of the XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes [http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-2-20120405/ Recommendation of 5 April 2012], the elements of OWL 2 which are based on XSD 1.1 are now considered required, and the note detailing the optional dependency on the XSD 1.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xmlschema11-2-20090430/ Candidate Recommendation of 30 April, 2009] has been removed from the "Status of this Document" section.

=== Changes Since Proposed Recommendation ===

No changes have been made to this document since the [http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-overview-20090922/ Proposed Recommendation of 22 September, 2009].

=== Changes Since Last Call ===

This section summarizes the changes to this document since the [http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-owl2-overview-20090611/ Last Call Working Draft of 11 June, 2009].
* Some minor editorial changes were made.
</div>

<div id="ack">

== Acknowledgements ==

{{:Shared_Acknowledgments}}
The editors extend special thanks to
Ivan Herman (W3C/ERCIM),
Ian Horrocks (Oxford University) and
Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Bell Labs Research, Alcatel-Lucent)
for their thorough reviews.

{{:Regular_attendees}}
{{:Past_Members}}

</div>

== References ==

{{:References/ref-owl-2-conformance}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-direct-semantics}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-manchester-syntax}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-new-features}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-primer}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-profiles}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-quick-reference}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-rdf-mapping}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-specification}}
{{:References/ref-owl-2-xml-serialization}}
{{:References/ref-rdf-semantics}}
{{:References/ref-rdf-syntax}}
{{:References/ref-turtle}}
{{:References/ref-uml}}
Templates used on this page:
Return to Document Overview.
Retrieved from "https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Document_Overview"
View source for Document Overview

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

OWL Working Group

Tools
