W3C

ERT WG

23 May 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
JohannesK, Shadi, Reinhard, David (IRC)
Regrets
CarlosI, CarlosV, Charles
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Reinhard

Contents


HTTP Vocabulary in RDF comments

JK: discusses issue 001 - incomplete response should be noted, when connection failed no response note can be taken,
... item was discussed in last conference
... talks about an incomplete HTTP-response

SAZ: possible scenario: client sends request, which is incomplete. Then a client might also recieve an incomplete response
... How does EARL handle incomplete responses (eg because of a server timeout)?

JK: Issue 003 was closed as NO during last conference.

<drooks> i think last week we said that issue 001 could be represented in HTTP RDF through the absence of an expected response class

JK: It is out of scope of the vocabulary

SAZ: Thinks it is META-Information on requests and responses
... would recommend it at least as optional information

JK: If we would take up response times - which element to take (eg from DC)

SAZ: There could be use cases where recording of timestamps might be useful in HTTP in RDF

<scribe> ACTION: SAZ: get feedback from working group on timestamp issues [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-er-minutes.html#action01]

SAZ: takes up Issue-017

JK: if default character encoding cannot be used, we wanted to use DATA URI
... inclusion of DTD can be solved through combination of seperate properties, which are combined

SAZ: We need a different concept for the body
... Maybe different classes according to different content types

<scribe> ACTION: JK: draft a concept for the solution of problem with body property (Issue 14,15 & 17) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-er-minutes.html#action02]

SAZ: we should try to get message headers as literal values

JK: we record the response code, but some persons might want to know the actual meaning

SAZ: Literal vs. predifined value consideration is also an performace issue
... keep on discussing the advantages/disadvantages of literal values and predifined values on the mailing list

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0015.html

JK: Thinks this approach is valuable, maybe also for other properties

RESOLUTION: tentativly accepted solution provided by SAZ

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: JK: draft a concept for the solution of problem with body property (Issue 14,15 & 17) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-er-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: SAZ: get feedback from working group on timestamp issues [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-er-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.128 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/05/23 16:31:45 $