See also: IRC log
<Christophe> Template at http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/IssuesTemplatePage
CI: Must there be agreement of the group that
it is really an issue?
... We should have a mechanism of approval.
CS: It is part of the review process Shadi proposed.
CI: Maybe we need an additional status.
... The moment when you create a new template is the moment where the
taskforce decides that there is an issue with a technique?
... nobody is going to enter issues in the issue template before the
taskforce decides in step 5?
CS: I think so.
EV: how can we discuss the issues in the telecon?
CI: agree with Vangelis, need to record issues
before
... maybe there can be an issue before creating the test sample
CS: yes, we need something else for that kind of issues
EV: we also can have more than 1 issue for 1 test sample
<Christophe> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Mar/0019.html
CS: Shadi proposed some changes to the review process (see link above)
no objections to the proposed change: new status "bug"
no objections to the proposed change: new status "issue"
CS summarizes discussion for Tim...
CS: There was a proposal to have fixed value for the complexity attribute (atomic). Any remarks?
no objections from the participants
CS: There was a proposal to set the primary attribute of the rule element to TRUE. Any remarks?
discussion between CS and TB...
CS: Is it clear enough?
no objections to set primary attribute to YES.
<scribe> ACTION: CS work on code that automates the structure review process [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]