ISSUE-63 - Public View

Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Window

Raised by:

Maciej Stachowiak

Opened on:

2006-04-04

Description:

Currently the spec says:

When an event implementing the <code>UIEvent</code> interface [DOM3EV] is dispatched on any 
node in a <code>Document</code> presented in a <term>browsing context</term>, the value of the 
<code>view</code> attribute of the event MUST be the <code>Window</code> object where the 
user originated the event.

This is arguably redundant with the requirement that views must implement the Window interface and 
the similar DOM Level 2 Views requirement about UIEvent:

   A UIEvent typically occurs upon a view of a Document (e.g., a mouse click on a browser frame 
rendering a particular Document instance). A UIEvent has an AbstractView associated with it which 
identifies both the particular (implementation-dependent) view in which the event occurs, and the 
target document the UIEvent is related to.

DOM Level 3 Events also says:

  view of type views::AbstractView, readonly 
      The view attribute identifies the AbstractView from which the event was generated.

Given this, we should probably drop the requirement for Window.

Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2006-04-04)
2. Re: ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? (from annevk@opera.com on 2006-04-06)
3. Re: Window: rewrite Navigation section, added History (from xmlizer@gmail.com on 2006-05-01)
4. Minutes, face to face meeting (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-05-15)

Related notes:

No additional notes.