ISSUE-119 - Public View

Should lengthComputable and total have names that start the same

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Progress Event

Raised by:

Anne van Kesteren

Opened on:

2007-07-31

Description:

Anne suggests [1] that we make lengthComutable and total align their names to 
$foo and $foo$computable.

Is there any reason not to consider this as a purely editorial issue? Did they 
already get implemented with these names somewhere?

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Jul/0048.html

Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-119: Should lengthComputable and total have names that start the same (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-07-31)
2. ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-10-28)
3. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-11-05)
4. Comparing Progress events with other specs... (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-11-19)
5. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-10)
6. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
7. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-12-10)
8. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
9. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-12-10)
10. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-10)
11. Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
12. Re: ISSUE-119: names length Computable and total (from Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com on 2007-12-17)

Related notes: