ACTION-207 - Public View
Check with W3C if we need to worry about licensing for IDL and bindings
- State:
- CLOSED
- Person:
- Charles Mccathienevile
- Due on:
- 2006-12-01
- Created on:
- 2006-09-19
- URI:
- Related emails:
- An RDF API for scripting etc (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-10-02)
- Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from danbri@danbri.org on 2006-10-02)
- Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from danbri@danbri.org on 2006-10-02)
- Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from ivan@w3.org on 2006-10-02)
- Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from dwood@softwarememetics.com on 2006-10-02)
- IDL licensing (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-12-12)
- Re: IDL licensing (from rigo@w3.org on 2006-12-12)
Related notes:
2006-09-21: Email sent 2006-09-20 asking if there was anything we needed to worry about, with default being to just carry on as we were.
2006-10-02: Check, if there hasn't been an official response.
2006-11-17: Chaals re-pinged W3C legal on 2006-11-17
2006-12-12: Stick with document license unless we hear something else...