W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

13 Sep 2006

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Chimezie_Ogbuji, ericP, briansuda, FabienGandon, Harry, +21717aaaa, iand, Rachel_Yager
Regrets
Ryager
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
chimezie

Contents


 

ericP: I believe we do

<briansuda> that's briansuda

<scribe> Scribe: chimezie

PROPOSED: Approve previous minutes

<ericP> http://research.talis.com/2006/grddl-wg/primer.html#introduction

RESOLUTION: http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/notes/Sep06-grddl-wg-minutes.htm is approved

iand: integrated various input into Primer

briansuda: possibly remove references to SPARQL?

FabienGandon: no problem with two SPARQL queries in primer. but generally concerned with references to SPARQL

ericP: is POX (Plain Old XML) a common acronym?

<FabienGandon> extract from use case is "the Atom Publishing Protocol's use of HTTP and POX (Plain Old XML) as the primary remote messaging mechanism "

ericP: better to say 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' than POX

<FabienGandon> +q to propose an RDFa section http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html

<scribe> ACTION: iand, Fabien to change wording of POX to 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' or something similar [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01]

Harry: is okay with going with usecase document and primer now and spec later

<FabienGandon> pointer is http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html

Harry: is the output RDF syntax or embedded RDFa?

FabienGandon: RDFa is the input and RDF comes out

iand: concerned with length of primer

iand: concerned about RDFa not being finalized

<iand> e.g syntax like <link rel="rdf:type" href="[foaf:Person]" />

Harry: it's in our scope and need to at least mention it (perhaps not in primer)

iand: rework examples to avoide the moving target

Harry: table RDFa from primer at least

FabienGandon: agrees proposes to submit to rdf-in-xhtml

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to submit to the RDFa example to rdf-in-xhtml [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02]

<scribe> ACTION: iand to remove references to RDFa from primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03]

FabienGandon: not clear on technical solution to usecase 7

<FabienGandon> Use case 7: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm#use_case_7

ericP: 'lifting and lowering' - markup in XML schema to accomodate transformation between XML & RDF

RDAL: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/03-rdal/

chimezie: isn't this currently out of scope of the current GRDDL mechanism?

ericP: mandatory attribute

HarryH: good practice for RDDL-in-GRDDL but in distant future..
... shouldn't include usecase 7
... RDFa as output shouldn't be included w/out concensus

Fabien, could you put your ACTION item, I didn't get the details?

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Fabien to open two threads on the two issues "RDFa production" and "XML Schema technical production" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04]

<FabienGandon> ACTION: Ryager to review the Use Cases for next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05]

okay, let me see if i remember how to wrap this up

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Fabien to open two threads on the two issues "RDFa production" and "XML Schema technical production" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Fabien to submit to the RDFa example to rdf-in-xhtml [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: iand to remove references to RDFa from primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: iand, Fabien to change wording of POX to 'single-purpose XML vocabulary' or something similar [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Ryager to review the Use Cases for next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2006/09/13 15:59:40 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: chimezie
Inferring ScribeNick: chimezie

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Chimezie_Ogbuji, ericP, briansuda, FabienGandon, Harry, +21717aaaa, iand, Rachel_Yager
Present: Chimezie_Ogbuji ericP briansuda FabienGandon Harry +21717aaaa iand Rachel_Yager

WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: danja)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ BenA


WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: BenA)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Murray


WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Murray)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ DanC


WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: DanC)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Ryager

Regrets: Ryager

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 13 Sep 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html
People with action items: fabien iand ryager

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]