ISSUE-99

Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example in Section 5.3

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDFa
Raised by:
Ben Adida
Opened on:
2008-03-20
Description:
raised by Micah Dubinko in [1].

"""
If I am reading the 21 Feb spec correctly, @src now can stand in for the 
subject of a triple in the absence of @about. Can somebody set me 
straight on how this squares with the leading example in section 5.3?

<div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein">
  <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span>
  <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span>
  <div rel="dbp:birthPlace" resource="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany">
    <span property="dbp:conventionalLongName">Federal Republic of Germany</span>
  </div>
  <img rel="foaf:depiction"
src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg" />
</div>


In particular, how does foaf:depiction fit in here? Given the image 
resource as a subject, shouldn't it use foaf:depicts?
"""

Probably Resolution: this is an editorial bug in section 5.3 where the usage of
@src hasn't been updated to the latest spec. Updating the example to bring the
@rel up one level is the way to fix this.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0114.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3 (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-03-20)

Related notes:

2008-05-08: This has been fixed in the latest draft (20080501).

2008-05-08: following up with Micah: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0043.html

2008-05-21: no response from Micah, but this is fixed and now closed.

2008-06-12: ACTION: Accept

2008-06-12: CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix

2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: fixed the example (wasn't updated from a pre-Last-Call draft).

2008-06-13: Micah agrees with resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0078.html

2008-06-13: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept