ISSUE-99
Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example in Section 5.3
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ben Adida
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-20
- Description:
raised by Micah Dubinko in [1]. """ If I am reading the 21 Feb spec correctly, @src now can stand in for the subject of a triple in the absence of @about. Can somebody set me straight on how this squares with the leading example in section 5.3? <div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein"> <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span> <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span> <div rel="dbp:birthPlace" resource="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany"> <span property="dbp:conventionalLongName">Federal Republic of Germany</span> </div> <img rel="foaf:depiction" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg" /> </div> In particular, how does foaf:depiction fit in here? Given the image resource as a subject, shouldn't it use foaf:depicts? """ Probably Resolution: this is an editorial bug in section 5.3 where the usage of @src hasn't been updated to the latest spec. Updating the example to bring the @rel up one level is the way to fix this. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0114.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3 (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-03-20)
Related notes:
2008-05-08: This has been fixed in the latest draft (20080501).
2008-05-08: following up with Micah: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0043.html
2008-05-21: no response from Micah, but this is fixed and now closed.
2008-06-12: ACTION: Accept
2008-06-12: CHANGE-TYPE: bug fix
2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: fixed the example (wasn't updated from a pre-Last-Call draft).
2008-06-13: Micah agrees with resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0078.html
2008-06-13: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept