ISSUE-91
Last Call Comment: informative section on other XML dialects states a requirement
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ben Adida
- Opened on:
- 2008-02-26
- Description:
" A. Other XML Languages "If a language includes @xml:base [XMLBASE], an RDFa parser for that host language must process it, and use its value to set [base]." Is this a requirement? The section is marked "informative". " by Johannes Koch in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0116.html Probable Resolution: we may not want to state any *requirements* about other host languages, probably only indications. Requires further discussion.
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-91: Last Call Comment: informative section on other XML dialects states a requirement (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-02-26)
- meeting record: 2008-03-13 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon (from swick@w3.org on 2008-03-13)
Related notes:
2008-03-20: RESOLVED in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes as "we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description (minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A."
2008-03-20: sent note to Johannes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0240.html
2008-04-30: CLOSED, since it is resolved.
2008-06-12: ACTION: Accept
2008-06-12: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: we remove the xml:base example, and move the xml:base description (minus example) into the main text, removing appendix A.
2008-06-12: Johannes acknowledges response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0257.html
2008-06-12: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept