ISSUE-174

Last Call Comment: Cycles and skos:closeMatch

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Sean Bechhofer
Opened on:
2008-10-06
Description:
Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]:

14) 10.6.5A missing discussion of Cycles involving skos:closeMatch. (editorial
or perhaps larger substantive)
Possible text:
[[
Since
<A> skos:exactMatch <B>
entails
<A> skos:closeMatch <A> (via S45, S46 and S42).
implementations must be able to cope with cycles in skos:closeMatch.
]]

This perhaps calls into question the stance in other sections where reflexivity
of other properties is left open as an implementation variability.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-174: Last Call Comment: Cycles and skos:closeMatch (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-06)
  2. Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
  3. RE: SKOS Comment (various) (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2008-10-07)
  4. Proposed resolution to No Change Issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-14)
  5. Proposed Resolution to Editorial Change issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-21)
  6. Re: SKOS Comment (various) [ISSUE-174] (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
  7. Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)

Related notes:

2008-10-23: ACTION: Accept

2008-10-23: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-10-23: RESOLUTION: Text as suggested has been included. We have, however, made no other substantial change to the document in response to your comment. The Working Group propose to close this issue.

2008-10-23: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept