ISSUE-171

Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Sean Bechhofer
Opened on:
2008-10-06
Description:
Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]:

11) range of skos:member (editorial?)

I take it as deliberate that no range was specified, although the examples are
consistent with a range being the union of skos:Concept with skos:Collection.
A discussion of the (lack of) range probably should be added to the notes section.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-06)
  2. Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
  3. RE: SKOS Comment (various) (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2008-10-07)
  4. Re: ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  5. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  6. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  7. ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  8. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: A similar comment was also raised regarding the range of skos:member (see ISSUE-151). To clarify the intended usage of the SKOS collections framework, we propose to state that the range of skos:member is the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection.

2008-12-15: Closed with no response from commenter.

2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None