ISSUE-167

Last Call Comment: Application Behaviour re. Top Concepts

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SKOS

Raised by:

Sean Bechhofer

Opened on:

2008-10-06

Description:

Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]:

6) editorial clarification (?)

The last sentence in section 4.6.3 I read as:

"An application may reject such data but is not required to."

which I think is a clearer wording if that is the intent. If that isn't the
intent then further wordsmithing may be necessary.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-167: Last Call Comment: Application Behaviour re. Top Concepts (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-06)
2. Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
3. RE: SKOS Comment (various) (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2008-10-07)
4. Proposed resolution to No Change Issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-14)
5. Proposed Resolution to Editorial Change issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-21)
6. Re: SKOS Comment (various) [ISSUE-167] (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
7. Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)

Related notes: