ISSUE-152
Last Call Comment: Prefix for extension labels
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Alistair Miles
- Opened on:
- 2008-10-01
- Description:
Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]: """ While namespace prefixes are completely arbitrary in principle, in practice conventional namespaces prefixes are useful for reinforcing understanding. Should the conventional namespace prefix for the extension labels incorporate the "skos" name as a reminder of the association as in "skosl" or "skosxl"? """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-152: Last Call Comment: Prefix for extension labels (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-01)
- Re: SKOS comment (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-01)
- Re: SKOS comment (from ehennum@us.ibm.com on 2008-10-02)
- Real List of No Changes! (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-14)
- Re: ISSUE-152: Last Call Comment: Prefix for extension labels (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- ISSUE-152: Last Call Comment: Prefix for extension labels (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: The Last Call Working Draft of the SKOS Reference [2] has adopted your suggestion, using "skosxl" as the conventional prefix for the SKOS XL namespace.
2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None