ISSUE-144
Last Call Comment: S44. S45
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Alistair Miles
- Opened on:
- 2008-09-30
- Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: """ Is there a reason why S44 and S45 aren't integrated into a single entry? """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
- Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
- Re: ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: Following your suggestion, we propose to combine S44 and S45 into a single entry.
2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None