ISSUE-117

Deprecated Vocabulary

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Sean Bechhofer
Opened on:
2008-04-17
Description:
How should we handle the deprecated (legacy) SKOS vocabulary in the SKOS
namespace document?  Should the RDF schema for SKOS include the deprecated
vocabulary or not?

Action assigned to Sean to write a proposal:
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action06
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-117: Deprecated Vocabulary (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-04-17)
  2. Draft SKOS Scheme (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-04-29)
  3. RE: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-25)
  4. RE: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 2008-07-25)
  5. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from bernard.vatant@mondeca.com on 2008-07-25)
  6. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from ses@unc.edu on 2008-07-25)
  7. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from fred@fgiasson.com on 2008-07-28)
  8. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 2008-07-28)
  9. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from fred@fgiasson.com on 2008-07-28)
  10. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from ses@unc.edu on 2008-07-28)
  11. RE: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from houghtoa@oclc.org on 2008-07-28)
  12. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2008-07-29)
  13. Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-07-29)
  14. [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-07-29)
  15. Re: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from bernard.vatant@mondeca.com on 2008-07-29)
  16. Re: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from ses@unc.edu on 2008-07-29)
  17. Re: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-07-29)
  18. RE: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from dstudhope@glam.ac.uk on 2008-07-29)
  19. Re: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from bernard.vatant@mondeca.com on 2008-07-30)
  20. RE: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-30)
  21. Re: [SKOS] the return of transitive and subproperty (was Re: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117)) (from bernard.vatant@mondeca.com on 2008-07-30)
  22. RE: SKOS comment: change of namespace (ISSUE-117) (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-07-31)

Related notes:

2008-04-17: 2008-04-07: Sean writes a proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0032.html

2008-04-17: 2008-04-08: Sean's proposal discussesd during telecon http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#item03

2008-04-17: 2008-04-15: Telecon notes that our rationale for decising this issue should be documented in the WG's Vocabulary Management Note deliverable http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-minutes.html

2008-04-17: See also: issue 118 "Deprecating Terms or Modifying Terms" on VM http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/118

2008-05-07: Closed through resolution on new SKOS namespace http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#skosnamespace