ISSUE-102
Last Call Comment: Better name than 'instanceof' is needed
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ben Adida
- Opened on:
- 2008-03-20
- Description:
raised by John Boyer in [1]: """ ... Instantiation does not appear to be what is happening in the case of RDFa. Instead, the element to which you attach "instanceof" is something to which you simply seem to be attaching some RDF type information. A name that more accurately reflects that behavior would be preferable. ... """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0211.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-102: Last Call Comment: Better name than \\'instanceof\\' is needed (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-03-20)
- meeting record: 2008-04-03 RDF-in-XHTML TF (from swick@w3.org on 2008-04-03)
Related notes:
2008-04-03: further comments by Elias: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0315.html
2008-04-10: RESOLVED to @typeof in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html
2008-06-12: ACTION: Accept
2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: changed @instanceof to @typeof
2008-06-16: CHANGE-TYPE: outstanding issue resolution (StevenP had objected)
2008-06-18: John accepts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0106.html
2008-06-18: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept