Disposition of comments for the Device and Sensors Working Group

paged view

In the table below, red is in the WG decision column indicates that the Working Group didn't agree with the comment, green indicates that a it agreed with it, and yellow reflects an in-between situation.

In the "Commentor reply" column, red indicates the commenter objected to the WG resolution, green indicates approval, and yellow means the commenter didn't respond to the request for feedback.

Commentor	Comment	Working Group decision	Commentor reply
LC-2602 Dominique Hazael-Massieux `<dom@w3.org>` (archived comment)	Hi, The LC WD of the vibration API uses exceptions for cases where the requested vibration is too long. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-vibration-20120202/ But WebIDL has removed support for raising exceptions in its syntax. In prose, an exception of a particular type can be thrown by using wording like the following: Throw a DOMException of type HierarchyRequestError with message â€œCannot append that Node hereâ€. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-exceptions Also, there should be a normative reference to WebIDL. Dom	ReSpec update: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2012Feb/0020.html Added text: "the user agent MAY throw a NotSupportedError exception [DOM4]" and "added a normative reference by adding the usual Web IDL boilerplate to the Conformance section" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2012Feb/0022.html	yes