Edit comment LC-2503 for XML Security Working Group

Quick access to

Next: LC-2504

Comment LC-2503
Commenter: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>

Resolution status:

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Cantor, Scott E. <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:
> On 6/20/11 8:37 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Is there some means to explicitly indicate the order in which
>>certificates in an xml dig sig file should be processed? The problem
>>is that if you screw up the certificate order in the xml file, the
>>validator (e.g,. xmlsec) does not know which cert is the end-entity.
> BP is EE first, the rest after (and technically the order of the rest
> isn't supposed to matter).

Can I get an assurance from the XML Sec working group that a
non-normative note will be added to the XML Dig Sig specification wrt
to this best practice? Please consider this comment implementer
feedback on the CR.
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)

Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2503.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:45:12 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org